LEADER 03676nam 2200649 a 450 001 9910462254803321 005 20211104201105.0 010 $a3-11-096605-0 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110966053 035 $a(CKB)2670000000249530 035 $a(EBL)935536 035 $a(OCoLC)843635264 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000625663 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11376255 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000625663 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10615436 035 $a(PQKB)10194396 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC935536 035 $a(WaSeSS)Ind00019721 035 $a(DE-B1597)45558 035 $a(OCoLC)979812595 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110966053 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL935536 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10591247 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000249530 100 $a20120907d1995 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aProsodic structure and French morphophonology$b[electronic resource] /$fStephen J. Hannahs 205 $aReprint 2010 210 $aTu?bingen $cMax Niemeyer Verlag$d1995 215 $a1 online resource (84 p.) 225 1 $aLinguistische Arbeiten,$x0344-6727 ;$v337 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a3-484-30337-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $tFront matter --$tChapter 1: Introduction and background --$tChapter 2: Nasalization, prefixation and French in- --$tChapter 3: Glide formation, closed syllable adjustment and schwa --$tChapter 4: Morphophonology and the learned/non-learned distinction --$tAppendix to Chapter Four --$tChapter 5: Model and interactions --$tChapter 6: Summary and conclusions --$tReferences 330 $aThis study is an examination of morphophonology in terms of the interaction between morphological structure and phonological structure. The goals of the study are to propose a coherent way of looking at morphophonology in structural terms while assuming a certain autonomy of the phonological and morphological components. The study assumes the basic lexical/postlexical dichotomy of Lexical Phonology, but refers centrally to prosodic structure of the type proposed by Selkirk (1980) and further developed by, among others, Nespor & Vogel (1986), rather than to level ordering. The specific processes of French morphophonology examined here include certain aspects of prefixation and nasalization, glide information, closed syllable adjustment and penultimate schwa specification, which are reanalysed in structural terms, in contrast to analyses in the literature relying on level ordering. Other aspects of French morphophonology argued in the literature to be rule governed, such as Learned Backing, are reanalysed in terms of stem suppletion. The study thus supports Aronoff & Sridhar (1987), Fabb (1988), Booji (1989) and others in arguing against level ordering, while following the lead of Booji & Lieber (1993), Inkelas (1989) and others in advocating the concurrent existence of both morphological and prosodic structure. 410 0$aLinguistische Arbeiten (Max Niemeyer Verlag) ;$v337. 606 $aFrench language$xProsodic analysis 606 $aFrench language$xMorphophonemics 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aFrench language$xProsodic analysis. 615 0$aFrench language$xMorphophonemics. 676 $a441.5 676 $a445 700 $aHannahs$b Stepehn J$0853742 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910462254803321 996 $aProsodic structure and French morphophonology$91906306 997 $aUNINA