LEADER 03243nam  2200601Ia 450 
001 9910462240503321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-4755-5891-0
010   $a1-4755-3464-7
035   $a(CKB)2670000000278850
035   $a(EBL)1606822
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000943221
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11503274
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000943221
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10975616
035   $a(PQKB)10666785
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1606822
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1606822
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10627071
035   $a(OCoLC)797981387
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000278850
100   $a20111102d2012      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aOn the extrapolation with the Denton proportional benchmarking method$b[electronic resource] /$fprepared by Tommaso Di Fonzo and Marco Marini
210   $aWashington, DC $cInternational Monetary Fund$d2012
215   $a1 online resource (22 p.)
225 0 $aIMF working paper ;$v12/169
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-4755-9105-5 
311   $a1-4755-0517-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aCover; Abstract; Contents; I. Introduction; II. The Denton PFD Benchmarking Method; III. The Enhanced Denton PFD Method for Extrapolation; A. An Approximation of the Enhanced PFD Method; IV. An Example with Artificial Data; Tables; 1. Extrapolation Using Forecast BI Ratios (Example 6.2, QNA Manual, 2001); 2. Enhanced Denton PFD: Comparison Between the Shortcut and the Analytical Solution; 3. Enhanced Denton PFD: Comparison with the Indicator Series; 4. Basic Denton PFD vs. Enhanced Denton PFD: MSD of Quarterly Growth Rates
327   $a5. Enhanced Denton PFD: Comparison Between the Analytical Solution and the Shortcut Version with Different BI RatiosV. An Application to Real-Life Data; 6. Forecasting Manufacturing Value Added in 2009 Using IPI: a Comparison Between PFD and EPFD; VI. Conclusions; References
330   $aStatistical offices have often recourse to benchmarking methods for compiling quarterly national accounts (QNA). Benchmarking methods employ quarterly indicator series (i) to distribute annual, more reliable series of national accounts and (ii) to extrapolate the most recent quarters not yet covered by annual benchmarks. The Proportional First Differences (PFD) benchmarking method proposed by Denton (1971) is a widely used solution for distribution, but in extrapolation it may suffer when the movements in the indicator series do not match consistently the movements in the target annual benchma
410  0$aIMF Working Papers
606   $aBenchmarking (Management)
606   $aManagerial accounting
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aBenchmarking (Management)
615  0$aManagerial accounting.
700   $aDi Fonzo$b Tommaso$0148119
701   $aMarini$b Marco$0734096
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910462240503321
996   $aOn the extrapolation with the Denton proportional benchmarking method$91909271
997   $aUNINA