LEADER 03743nam 2200685 a 450 001 9910462049703321 005 20210114205737.0 010 $a1-283-58218-X 010 $a9786613894632 010 $a0-19-157178-4 035 $a(CKB)2670000000236990 035 $a(StDuBDS)AH24219703 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000736515 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12300289 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000736515 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10772908 035 $a(PQKB)10543669 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000370256 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11276428 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000370256 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10374278 035 $a(PQKB)11211624 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3054846 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000236990 100 $a20110615e20112009 fy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aBeyond consequentialism$b[electronic resource] /$fby Paul Hurley 210 $aOxford $cOxford University Press$d2011 215 $a1 online resource (288 p.) 300 $aOriginally published: 2009. 311 $a0-19-969843-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 8 $aHurley sets out a radical challenge to consequentialism, the theory which might seem to be the default option in contemporary moral philosophy. There is an unresolved tension within the theory: if consequentialists are right about the content of morality, then morality cannot have the rational authority that even they take it to have.$bConsequentialism, the theory that morality requires us to promote the best overall outcome, is the default alternative in contemporary moral philosophy, and is highly influential in public discourses beyond academic philosophy. Paul Hurley argues that current discussions of the challenge consequentialism tend to overlook a fundamental challenge to consequentialism. The standard consequentialist account of the content of morality, he argues, cannot be reconciled to theauthoritativeness of moral standards for rational agents. If rational agents typically have decisive reasons to do what morality requires, then consequentialism cannot be the correct account of moral standards. Hurley builds upon this challenge to argue that the consequentialist case for grounding the impartialevaluation of actions in the impartial evaluation of outcomes is built upon a set of subtle and mutually reinforcing mistakes. Through exposing these mistakes and misappropriations, he undermines consequentialist arguments against alternative approaches that recognize a conception of impartiality appropriate to the evaluation of actions which is distinct from the impartiality appropriate to the evaluation of outcomes. A moral theory that recognizes a fundamental role for such a distinctconception of impartiality can account for the rational authority of moral standards, but does so, Hurley argues, by taking morality beyond consequentialism in both its standard and non-standard forms. 606 $aConsequentialism (Ethics) 606 $aPragmatism 606 $aPhilosophy$2ukslc 606 $aPhilosophy$2HILCC 606 $aPhilosophy & Religion$2HILCC 606 $aEthics$2HILCC 608 $aElectronic books.$2lcsh 615 0$aConsequentialism (Ethics) 615 0$aPragmatism. 615 7$aPhilosophy. 615 7$aPhilosophy 615 7$aPhilosophy & Religion 615 7$aEthics 676 $a171.5 700 $aHurley$b Paul$g(Paul E.)$0870565 801 0$bStDuBDS 801 1$bStDuBDS 801 2$bStDuBDSZ 801 2$bUkPrAHLS 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910462049703321 996 $aBeyond consequentialism$91943429 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03112nam 22005175 450 001 9911031574603321 005 20251001130629.0 010 $a3-031-97845-5 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-97845-6 035 $a(CKB)41521024600041 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC32323672 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL32323672 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-97845-6 035 $a(EXLCZ)9941521024600041 100 $a20251001d2025 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aFreedom of Expression and Social Movements in the Digital Era $eA Case Study of the 2015 Oromo Protest in Ethiopia /$fby Elsabet Samuel Tadesse 205 $a1st ed. 2025. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer Nature Switzerland :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2025. 215 $a1 online resource (256 pages) 225 1 $aPolitical Science and International Studies 311 08$a3-031-97844-7 327 $aChapter 1: Political Protests and Social Movements in Context -- Chapter 2: Contours of the 2015 Oromo Protest -- Chapter 3: Cross-Learning Process Across Social Movements -- Chapter 4: The 2015 Oromo Protest and Legal Reform Process -- Chapter 5: Concluding Notes and Ways Forward. 330 $aThe book discusses the 2015 Oromo protest as a social movement that brought about new practices and new actors to the exercise of freedom of expression and information through its use of the Internet as an alternative communication platform and a site of political resistance. It is based on empirical data to analyze how collective movements, identity politics, and the Internet interacted and resulted in government change in contexts where draconian regimes operate and access to the Internet is minimal and expensive. The book scrutinizes the genesis and trajectories of the Oromo protest to provide insights into the diffusion of protest tactics learned from other domestic and global movements. It also introduces peculiar mass mobilization and communication tactics the Oromo protest utilized to establish a shared vision between the urban-digital activists and the rural-offline protesters. Elsabet Samuel Tadesse is a Media Development, Human Rights and Democracy Researcher and Specialist and has held positions at Civil Rights Defenders - Stockholm, International Center for Journalists - Washington DC, and the International Media Support ? Copenhagen. 410 0$aPolitical Science and International Studies 606 $aAfrica$xPolitics and government 606 $aHuman rights 606 $aAfrican Politics 606 $aPolitics and Human Rights 615 0$aAfrica$xPolitics and government. 615 0$aHuman rights. 615 14$aAfrican Politics. 615 24$aPolitics and Human Rights. 676 $a963.072 700 $aTadesse$b Elsabet Samuel$01850351 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911031574603321 996 $aFreedom of Expression and Social Movements in the Digital Era$94443346 997 $aUNINA