LEADER 03540nam 2200637 450 001 9910461560103321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-283-20231-X 010 $a9786613202314 010 $a1-4411-0386-4 035 $a(CKB)2670000000107007 035 $a(EBL)743018 035 $a(OCoLC)741691673 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000524072 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11347428 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000524072 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10546631 035 $a(PQKB)10747789 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC743018 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL743018 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10867004 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL320231 035 $a(OCoLC)893335874 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000107007 100 $a20020718h20022002 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMark's gospel-- prior or posterior? $ea reappraisal of the phenomenon of order /$fDavid J. Neville 210 1$aLondon ;$aNew York :$cSheffield Academic Press,$d[2002] 210 4$dİ2002 215 $a1 online resource (409 p.) 225 1 $aJournal for the study of the New Testament. Supplement series ;$v222 225 1 $aLibrary of New Testament studies 300 $aSequel to: Arguments from order in Synoptic source criticism. 311 $a1-84127-265-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [350]-370) and indexes. 327 $aContents; Preface and Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Introduction; Part I: PRELIMINARY ISSUES FOR ANALYSING THE PHENOMENON OF ORDER; Chapter 1 PERICOPE DIVISIONS AND THE QUESTION OF PARALLELS; Chapter 2 TOWARDS AN ARRANGEMENT OF PARALLEL PERICOPES; Part II: THE VALUE OF FORMAL ARGUMENTS FROM ORDER; Chapter 3 TWO FORMAL ARGUMENTS FROM ORDER; Chapter 4 THE PHENOMENON OF CORRELATION; Part III: COMPOSITIONAL ARGUMENTS FROM ORDER: A REAPPRAISAL; Chapter 5 COMPOSITIONAL CONVENTIONS IN THE FIRST CENTURY CE; Chapter 6 THE DISAGREEMENTS IN ORDER IN LUKE 3.1-5.11 327 $aChapter 7 THE DISAGREEMENTS IN ORDER IN MATTHEW 4.23-9.35Chapter 8 IS MARK'S GOSPEL POSTERIOR? THE EVIDENCE OF PERICOPE ORDER; Conclusions; Appendix 1 THE SEGMENTATION OF THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS; Appendix 2 STATISTICAL TESTS OF THE PHENOMENON OF CORRELATION; Bibliography; Index of References; Index of Authors; D; K; R; W; Y 330 $aThe similarities and difference of arrangement and order of episodes in the gospels of Mark, Matthew and Luke have always been one of the major critera for resolving the Synoptic Problem. How important, and how reliable are arguments based on such considerations, and where might they lead? Here Neville reviews these issues in detail, explaining the significance of his conclusions for understanding the literary relationships among the three Synoptics gospels, and particularly for the competing theories of Markan priority (the standard two-source hypothesis) and Markan posteriority (the Griesbac 410 0$aJournal for the study of the New Testament.$pSupplement series ;$v222. 410 0$aLibrary of New Testament studies. 606 $aArgument from order of pericopes (Synoptics criticism) 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aArgument from order of pericopes (Synoptics criticism) 676 $a226/.066 700 $aNeville$b David J.$0863496 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910461560103321 996 $aMark's gospel-- prior or posterior$91927361 997 $aUNINA