LEADER 03574nam 2200661 450 001 9910461456103321 005 20210511002507.0 010 $a3-11-042959-4 010 $a3-11-042970-5 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110429596 035 $a(CKB)3710000000482416 035 $a(EBL)4006848 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001597672 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16297807 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001597672 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14885356 035 $a(PQKB)10867977 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4006848 035 $a(DE-B1597)452889 035 $a(OCoLC)979589813 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110429596 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4006848 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11128578 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL838220 035 $a(OCoLC)935244115 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000482416 100 $a20151223h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnnu---|u||u 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aTelling what she thinks $esemantics and pragmatics of propositional attitude reports /$fTomoo Ueda 210 1$aBerlin, [Germany] ;$aBoston, [Massachusetts] :$cDe Gruyter,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (186 p.) 225 1 $aEpistemische Studien,$x2198-1884 ;$vBand 33 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-11-042960-8 311 $a3-11-043880-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tList of Figures --$tList of Tables --$tAcknowledgments --$tList of abbreviations --$t1. The central problems --$t2. Structured propositionalism and its shared assumptions --$t3. Indirectness of speech and role of deixis --$t4. Metaphysical status of propositional attitudes --$t5. Communicative framework and discursive opacity --$t6. Opacity as a feature of the frame --$t7. Adverbial account of the frame --$t8. The VarCA Analysis --$t9. Consequences of the opaque VarCA --$t10. Conclusion --$tList of sentences --$tBibliography --$tSource of linguistic data --$tIndex 330 $aFrege?s puzzle concerning belief reports has been in the middle of the discussion on semantics and pragmatics of attitude reports: The intuition behind the opacity does not seem to be consistent with the thesis of semantic innocence according to which the semantic value of proper names is nothing but their referent. Main tasks of this book include providing truth-conditional content of belief reports. Especially, the focus is on semantic values of proper names. The key aim is to extend Crimmins?s basic idea of semantic pretense and the introduction of pleonastic entities proposed by Schiffer. They enable us to capture Frege?s puzzle in the analysis without giving up semantic innocence. To reach this conclusion, two issues are established. First, based on linguistic evidence, the frame of belief reports functions adverbially rather than relationally. Second, the belief ascriptions, on which each belief report is made, must be analyzed in terms of the measurement-theoretic analogy. 410 0$aDeutsche Hochschulschriften.$pEpistemische Studien ;$vBand 33. 606 $aPropositional attitudes 606 $aPragmatics 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aPropositional attitudes. 615 0$aPragmatics. 676 $a160 700 $aUeda$b Tomoo$01005147 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910461456103321 996 $aTelling what she thinks$92310328 997 $aUNINA