LEADER 03213nam 2200589 a 450 001 9910461196903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a3-8428-2273-1 035 $a(CKB)2670000000171166 035 $a(EBL)887655 035 $a(OCoLC)784887765 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000659622 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12224999 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000659622 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10694735 035 $a(PQKB)11269244 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC887655 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL887655 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10553065 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000171166 100 $a20120420d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aWomen's quotas under EU equality law$b[electronic resource] /$fKatharina Radloff 210 $aHamburg $cDiplomica Verlag$d2012 215 $a1 online resource (66 p.) 300 $aTitle from cover. 311 $a3-8428-7273-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aWomen's Quotas under EU Equality Law; Abstract; TABLE OF CONTENTS; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Problem Statement; 1.2 Method; 2. Equality and Positive Action in the European Union; 2.1 Equal Treatment as a Fundamental Right; 2.2 Positive Action in the European Union; 2.3 The Principle of Strict Interpretation: Kalanke (1995); 2.4 One Step at a Time: Marshall (1997); 2.5 Towards substantive equality? Badeck (2000); 2.6 Equal Qualifications as a Condition for Equal Treatment: Abrahamsson (2002); 2.7 The Requirement of Proportionality: Lommers (2002) 327 $a2.8 Extending the Scope for Lawful Positive Action: Briheche (2004)2.9 Chapter Findings; 3. Comparative Study; 3.1 The overall Trend in Europe; 3.2 Norway; 3.3 France; 3.4 Germany; 3.5 The Compatibility of the Norwegian and French Quotas with EU law; 4. Time for a Change?; 5. Conclusion; 6. List of References; 7. Annex; Autorenprofil 330 $aHauptbeschreibungThe purpose of this study is to investigate legislation and leading cases concerning positive discrimination in the European Union, with a particular focus on the recent debate about the most radical positive action measure: the implementation of women's quotas by supranational legislation. This study seeks to answer the question if such a radical derogation from the equal treatment principle can be tolerated, keeping in mind the fundamental character of this principle in European law. The concept of substantive equality will be analysed and set against the ECJ 606 $aEqual pay for equal work$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aWomen$xEmployment$xLaw and legislation$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aWomen$xEmployment$zEuropean Union countries 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aEqual pay for equal work 615 0$aWomen$xEmployment$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aWomen$xEmployment 676 $a342.4108/5 676 $a342.41085 700 $aRadloff$b Katharina$0942682 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910461196903321 996 $aWomen's quotas under EU equality law$92127294 997 $aUNINA