LEADER 04502nam 22006611c 450 001 9910461196003321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a0-567-66073-7 010 $a1-280-57941-2 010 $a9786613609182 010 $a0-567-48497-1 024 7 $a10.5040/9780567660732 035 $a(CKB)2670000000178652 035 $a(EBL)894535 035 $a(OCoLC)787843483 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000661928 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11404250 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000661928 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10712480 035 $a(PQKB)10251781 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC894535 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL894535 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10554651 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL360918 035 $a(OCoLC)1057402194 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09258284 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000178652 100 $a20150227d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDoctrine, dynamic and difference $fPieter de Witte 210 1$aLondon $aNew York $cT&T Clark $d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (273 p.) 225 1 $aEcclesiological investigations $vv. 15 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-567-31682-3 311 $a0-567-23665-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 241-250) and index 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. The Joint Declaration on Justification: Basis Issues -- 3. Reception of Theological Advances -- 4. The Reception of Previous Dialogue Results -- 5. The Joint Declaration: A Textual Analysis -- 6. Conclusion 330 $a"One of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal difference."--Bloomsbury Publishing 330 8 $aOne of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal difference 410 0$aEcclesiological investigations ;$vv. 15. 517 1 $aDoctrine, dynamic and difference : to the heart of the Lutheran-Roman Catholic differentiated consensus on justification 606 $aJustification (Christian theology) 606 $2Christian Churches & denominations 615 0$aJustification (Christian theology) 676 $a234.7 700 $aWitte$b Pieter de$0854638 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910461196003321 996 $aDoctrine, dynamic and difference$91908459 997 $aUNINA