LEADER 04240nam 22006371c 450 001 9910461068203321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a1-4725-4959-7 010 $a1-283-19704-9 010 $a9786613197047 010 $a0-567-35237-4 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472549594 035 $a(CKB)2670000000106388 035 $a(EBL)742395 035 $a(OCoLC)745866021 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000520938 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12233465 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000520938 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10514284 035 $a(PQKB)10852682 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC742395 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL742395 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10490377 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL319704 035 $a(OCoLC)747106514 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09255652 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000106388 100 $a20140929d2005 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aApocalypticism, anti-semitism and the historical Jesus $esubtexts in criticism $fedited by John S. Kloppenborg with John W. Marshall 210 1$aLondon $aNew York $cT & T Clark International $d2005. 215 $a1 online resource (154 p.) 225 1 $aJournal for the study of the New Testament. Supplement series $v275 300 $aThe essays in this volume orignated as the fruit of a symposium, held on March 7, 2003 311 $a0-567-08428-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [131]-139) and index 327 $aContents; Preface; Abbreviations; As ONE UNKNOWN, WITHOUT A NAME? CO-OPTING THE APOCALYPTIC JESUS; THE CIPHER 'JUDAISM' IN CONTEMPORARY HISTORICAL JESUS SCHOLARSHIP; COMPASSION IS TO PURITY AS FISH IS TO BICYCLE, AND OTHER REFLECTIONS ON CONSTRUCTIONS OF 'JUDAISM' IN CURRENT WORK ON THE HISTORICAL JESUS; APOCALYPTICISM AND ANTI-SEMITISM: INNER-GROUP RESOURCES FOR INTER-GROUP CONFLICTS; THE EARTH MOVED: JESUS, SEX, AND ESCHATOLOGY; THE PROBLEM OF APOCALYPTIC: FROM POLEMIC TO APOLOGETICS; THEOLOGICAL STAKES IN THE APOCALYPTIC JESUS DEBATE; RESPONSES; Bibliography; Index of Authors 330 8 $aVirtually all scholars agree that apocalyptic and millenarianism formed at least part of the matrix of the culture in first-century Jewish Palestine, but there is a sharp disagreement concerning the extent to which Jesus shared apocalyptic and millenarian beliefs. Although there has been a great deal written defending or opposing an 'apocalyptic Jesus', almost nothing has been said on the questions of what, from the standpoint of modern historiography of Jesus, is at stake in the issue of whether or not he was an apocalypticist or a millenarian prophet, and what is at stake in arguing that his alleged apocalypticism is a central and defining characteristic, rather than an incidental feature. Much has been said on the kind of Jew Jesus was, but almost nothing is said on why the category of Judaism has become so central to historical Jesus debates. These questions have less to do with the quantity and character of the available ancient evidence than they do with the ways in which the modern critic assembles evidence into a coherent picture, and the ideological and theological subtexts of historical Jesus scholarship. Scholars of Christian origins have been rather slow to inquire into the ideological location of their own work as scholars, but it is this question that is crucial in achieving a critical self-awareness of the larger entailments of historical scholarship on Jesus and the early Jesus movement. This volume begins the inquiry into the ideological location of modern historical Jesus scholarship. JSHJ, JSNTS275 410 0$aJournal for the study of the New Testament.$pSupplement series ;$v275. 606 $aMillennialism$zPalestine$xHistory$vCongresses 606 $2Christianity 615 0$aMillennialism$xHistory 676 $a232.908 702 $aKloppenborg$b John S.$f1951- 702 $aMarshall$b John W$g(John William),$f1958- 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910461068203321 996 $aApocalypticism, anti-semitism and the historical Jesus$92217510 997 $aUNINA