LEADER 03767nam 2200697 450 001 9910460908003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8047-9602-5 024 7 $a10.1515/9780804796026 035 $a(CKB)3710000000450663 035 $a(EBL)3568963 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001532638 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12497673 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001532638 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11474339 035 $a(PQKB)10927194 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001372869 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3568963 035 $a(DE-B1597)563710 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780804796026 035 $a(PPN)194959813 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3568963 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11085705 035 $a(OCoLC)914711703 035 $a(OCoLC)1198931188 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000450663 100 $a20150814h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 04$aThe rise and fall of urban economies $elessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles /$fMichael Storper [and three others] 210 1$aStanford, California :$cStanford Business Books,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (xvi, 305 pages) $cillustrations, maps 225 1 $aInnovation and Technology in the World Economy 300 $aPreviously issued in print: 2015. 311 $a1-5036-0066-1 311 $a0-8047-8940-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aList of Figures, Maps, and Tables; Acknowledgments; 1. The Divergent Development of Urban Regions; 2. Divergent Development: The Conceptual Challenge; 3. The Motor of Divergence: High-Wage or Low-Wage Specialization; 4. The Role of Labor in Divergence: Quality of Workers or Quality of Jobs?; 5. Economic Specialization: Pathways to Change; 6. Economic Development Policies: Their Role in Economic Divergence; 7. Beliefs and Worldviews in Economic Development: To Which Club Do We Belong?; 8. Seeing the Landscape: The Relational Infrastructure of Regions; 9. Connecting the Dots: What Caused Divergence?; 10. Shaping Economic Development: Policies and Strategies; 11. Improving Analysis of Urban Regions: Methods and Models; Notes; Works Cited; Index 330 8 $aToday, the Bay Area is home to the most successful knowledge economy in America, while Los Angeles has fallen progressively farther behind its neighbour to the north and a number of other American metropolises. Yet, in 1970, experts would have predicted that L.A. would outpace San Francisco in population, income, economic power, and influence. The usual factors used to explain urban growth - luck, immigration, local economic policies, and the pool of skilled labour - do not account for the contrast between the two cities and their fates. So what does? This book challenges many of the conventional notions about economic development and sheds new light on its workings. 410 0$aInnovation and technology in the world economy. 606 $aEconomic development$zCalifornia$zSan Francisco Bay Area 606 $aEconomic development$zCalifornia$zLos Angeles Metropolitan Area 607 $aSan Francisco Bay Area (Calif.)$xEconomic conditions 607 $aLos Angeles Metropolitan Area (Calif.)$xEconomic conditions 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aEconomic development 615 0$aEconomic development 676 $a330.9494/61 700 $aStorper$b Michael, $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0144847 702 $aStorper$b Michael 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910460908003321 996 $aThe rise and fall of urban economies$92450414 997 $aUNINA