LEADER 03650nam 2200625 450 001 9910460853903321 005 20180731045421.0 010 $a90-272-6808-8 035 $a(CKB)3710000000494435 035 $a(EBL)4386594 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001571200 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16221087 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001571200 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)13333143 035 $a(PQKB)10215273 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)14632287 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)12409567 035 $a(PQKB)21221729 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4386594 035 $a(DLC) 2015029751 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000494435 100 $a20150727h20152015 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aScrutinizing argumentation in practice /$fedited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, University of Amsterdam 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d[2015] 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (353 p.) 225 1 $aArgumentation in Context,$x1877-6884 ;$vvolume 9 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-1126-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aScrutinizing Argumentation in Practice; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Foreword; PART I A general perspective applied to scientific controversies; Arguing in the Grooves; 1. Introduction; 2. Genre and language constraints; 2.1 Types of controversies and their resolution; 3. That woodpecker; 4. Arsenic-incorporating bacteria; 5. The hobbit; 6. Conclusion; References ; PART II Argumentation in a political context; Cultural differences in political debate; 1. Introduction; 2. The debates in context; 2.1 The 2010 British Prime Minister debates 327 $a2.3 Argumentative acts between Pragma-dialectics and ScaPoLine3. Illustrative analysis; 3.1 Confrontation Stage coded through REPORTED-DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.2 Confrontation & Concluding Stage through NEGATIVE + DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.3 Argumentation Stage through QUOTED SPEECH; 4. Concluding; References ; A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. The implementation of pragmatic argumentation in legal justification as part of a stereotypical pattern of argumentation; 2.1 The argumentation on the first level of the main argumentation: Pragmatic argumentation 327 $a2.2 The argumentation on the second and third level of the subordinate argumentation3. Exemplary analysis of the use of argumentation referring to consequences in light of the purpose of the rule in legal justification; 3.1 The justification of the applicability of the argumentation scheme of pragmatic argumentation; 4. Conclusion; References; Transparency in legal argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. Administrative judicial decisions as a specific activity type; 3. Dutch administrative law procedure; 4. Administrative judicial decisions and the composite audience 327 $a5. Addressing a compositite audience 410 0$aArgumentation in context ;$vv. 9. 606 $aPersuasion (Rhetoric) 606 $aDiscourse analysis 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aPersuasion (Rhetoric) 615 0$aDiscourse analysis. 676 $a808 702 $aEemeren$b F. H. van$g(Frans Hendrik),$f1946- 702 $aGarssen$b Bart 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910460853903321 996 $aScrutinizing argumentation in practice$92128816 997 $aUNINA