LEADER 02938nam  2200673 a 450 
001 9910460356103321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-283-02015-7
010   $a9786613020154
010   $a0-262-29560-1
035   $a(CKB)2670000000079855
035   $a(EBL)3339204
035   $a(OCoLC)741251229
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000471060
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12231084
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000471060
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10416331
035   $a(PQKB)10723068
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000131050
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3339204
035   $a(OCoLC)707923182$z(OCoLC)960205044$z(OCoLC)961542362$z(OCoLC)962635547$z(OCoLC)988430442$z(OCoLC)991974941$z(OCoLC)1037923195$z(OCoLC)1038649993$z(OCoLC)1045490498$z(OCoLC)1055384589$z(OCoLC)1058096060$z(OCoLC)1062890077$z(OCoLC)1081216684
035   $a(OCoLC-P)707923182
035   $a(MaCbMITP)8641
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3339204
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10453050
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL302015
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000079855
100   $a20100621d2010      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aMajority judgment$b[electronic resource] $emeasuring, ranking, and electing /$fMichel Balinski and Rida Laraki
210   $aCambridge, Mass. $cMIT Press$dc2010
215   $a1 online resource (431 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-262-01513-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
327   $aCover ; Contents; Preface; 1 Majority Judgment; 2 Voting in Practice; 3 Traditional Social Choice; 4 Electing versus Ranking in the Traditional Model; 5 Strategy in the Traditional Model; 6 Fallacies of the Traditional Model in Voting; 7 Judging in Practice; 8 Common Language; 9 New Model; 10 Strategy in Grading; 11 Meaningfulness; 12 Majority-Grade; 13 Majority-Ranking; 14 Large Electorates; 15 Common Language: Voting; 16 Objections to Majority Judgment; 17 Point-Summing Methods; 18 Approval Voting; 19 Comparisons of Voting Methods; 20 The Game of Voting; 21 Multicriteria Ranking
327   $a22 A Summing UpReferences; Name Index; Subject Index
330 8 $aThis title provides an account of a new theory and method of voting, judging and ranking, 'majority judgement', shown to be superior to all other known methods.
606   $aSocial choice
606   $aVoting
606   $aRanking and selection (Statistics)
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aSocial choice.
615  0$aVoting.
615  0$aRanking and selection (Statistics)
676   $a302/.13
700   $aBalinski$b M. L$041011
701   $aLaraki$b Rida$0741259
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910460356103321
996   $aMajority judgment$91471053
997   $aUNINA