LEADER 02474nam 2200577 450 001 9910460265403321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-4438-7872-3 035 $a(CKB)3710000000433551 035 $a(EBL)2076499 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001561177 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16200270 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001561177 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14829828 035 $a(PQKB)11168996 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC2076499 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL2076499 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11068974 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL819806 035 $a(OCoLC)913333343 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000433551 100 $a20150707h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aAin'thology $ethe history and life of a taboo word /$fedited by Patricia Donaher and Seth Katz 210 1$aNewcastle upon Tyne, England :$cCambridge Scholars Publishing,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (376 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4438-7450-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $aTABLE OF CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; INTRODUCTION; I; CHAPTER ONE; CHAPTER TWO; CHAPTER THREE; II; CHAPTER FOUR; CHAPTER FIVE; CHAPTER SIX; CHAPTER SEVEN; III; CHAPTER EIGHT; CHAPTER NINE; CHAPTER TEN; IV; CHAPTER ELEVEN; CHAPTER TWELVE; CHAPTER THIRTEEN; CONTRIBUTORS; INDEX 330 $aThe word ain't is used by speakers of all dialects and sociolects of English. Nonetheless, language critics view ain't as marking speakers as ""lazy"" or ""stupid""; and the educated assume ain't is on its deathbed, used only in cliche?s. Everyone has an opinion about ain't. Even the grammar-checker in Microsoft Word flags every ain't with a red underscore. But why? Over the past 100 years, only a few articles and sections of books have reviewed the history of ain't or discussed it in dialect cont... 606 $aTaboo, Linguistic 606 $aEnglish language$xSemantics 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aTaboo, Linguistic. 615 0$aEnglish language$xSemantics. 676 $a417.2 702 $aDonaher$b Patricia 702 $aKatz$b Seth 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910460265403321 996 $aAin'thology$92099219 997 $aUNINA