LEADER 02410nam  2200625 a 450 
001 9910459966903321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-282-69754-4
010   $a9786612697548
010   $a0-472-02295-4
035   $a(CKB)2670000000040788
035   $a(OCoLC)698586726
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10404251
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000421456
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11296305
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000421456
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10407954
035   $a(PQKB)11129290
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3414899
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3414899
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10404251
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL269754
035   $a(OCoLC)923503258
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000040788
100   $a20080418d2008      ub             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aJudges and unjust laws$b[electronic resource] $ecommon law constitutionalism and the foundations of judicial review /$fDouglas E. Edlin
210   $aAnn Arbor $cUniversity of Michigan Press$dc2008
215   $a1 online resource (336 p.) 
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311   $a0-472-11662-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 283-299) and index.
327   $aThe common law -- The source-based argument for the judicial obligation to apply the law -- The conceptual argument for the judicial obligation to apply the law -- The source-based argument for the judicial obligation to develop the law : part I (England) -- The source-based argument for the judicial obligation to develop the law : part II (United States) -- The conceptual argument for the judicial obligation to develop the law -- Common law review -- Common law review in two common law systems.
606   $aJudge-made law$zGreat Britain
606   $aJudge-made law$zUnited States
606   $aJudicial review$zGreat Britain
606   $aJudicial review$zUnited States
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aJudge-made law
615  0$aJudge-made law
615  0$aJudicial review
615  0$aJudicial review
676   $a347/.012
700   $aEdlin$b Douglas E$0908280
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910459966903321
996   $aJudges and unjust laws$92031435
997   $aUNINA