LEADER 06259nam 22008051c 450 001 9910459910003321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a1-4725-6515-0 010 $a1-282-98448-9 010 $a9786612984488 010 $a1-84731-591-7 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472565150 035 $a(CKB)2670000000069482 035 $a(EBL)632579 035 $a(OCoLC)698116888 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000472347 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12187197 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000472347 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10433609 035 $a(PQKB)10758734 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772654 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC632579 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09256163 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL632579 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000069482 100 $a20140929d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aPrevious convictions at sentencing $etheoretical and applied perspectives $fedited by Julian V. Roberts and Andrew von Hirsch 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford $aPortland, Oregon $cHart Publishing $d2010. 215 $a1 online resource (268 p.) 225 1 $aStudies in penal theory and penal ethics 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-84946-684-X 311 $a1-84946-042-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index 327 $aProportionality and the progressive loss of mitigation : some further reflections / Andrew von Hirsch -- First-offender sentencing discounts : exploring the justifications / Julian V. Roberts -- Recidivism, retributivism, and the lapse theory of previous convictions / Jesper Ryberg -- Repeat offenders and the question of desert / Youngjae lee -- 'More to apologise for' : can we find a basis for the recidivist premium in a communicative theory of punishment? / Chris Bennett -- The questionable relevance of previous convictions to punishments for later crimes / Michael Tonry -- Prior-conviction sentencing enhancements : rationales and limits based on retributive and utilitarian proportionality principles and social equality goals / Richard S. Frase -- The illusion of proportionality : desert and repeat offenders / Kevin R. Reitz -- Dimensions of criminal history : reflections on theory and practice / Martin Wasik -- The role of previous convictions in England and Wales / Estella Baker and Andrew Ashworth -- Previous convictions and proportionate punishment under swedish law -- Peter Asp -- Assessing the impact of a recidivist sentencing premium on crime and recidivism rates / Lila Kazemian 327 $a1 Proportionality and the Progressive Loss of Mitigation: Some Further Reflections -- Andrew von Hirsch -- 2 First-Offender Sentencing Discounts: Exploring the Justifications -- Julian V Roberts -- 3 Recidivism, Retributivism, and the Lapse Theory of Previous Convictions -- Jesper Ryberg -- 4 Repeat Offenders and the Question of Desert -- Youngjae Lee -- 5 'More to Apologise For': Can We Find a Basis for the Recidivist Premium in a Communicative Theory of Punishment? -- Chris Bennett -- 6 The Questionable Relevance of Previous Convictions to Punishments for Later Crimes -- Michael Tonry -- 7 Prior-conviction Sentencing Enhancements: Rationales and Limits Based on Retributive and Utilitarian Proportionality Principles and Social Equality Goals -- Richard S Frase -- 8 The Illusion of Proportionality: Desert and Repeat Offenders -- Kevin R Reitz -- 9 Dimensions of Criminal History: Reflections on Theory and Practice -- Martin Wasik -- 10 The Role of Previous Convictions in England and Wales -- Estella Baker and Andrew Ashworth -- x Contents -- 11 Previous Convictions and Proportionate Punishment under Swedish Law -- Petter Asp -- 12 Assessing the Impact of a Recidivist Sentencing Premium on Crime and Recidivism Rates -- Lila Kazemian -- Index 330 8 $aThis latest volume in the Penal Theory and Penal Ethics series addresses one of the oldest and most contested questions in the field of criminal sentencing: should an offender's previous convictions affect the sentence? This question provokes a series of others: Is it possible to justify a discount for first offenders within a retributive sentencing framework? How should previous convictions enter into the sentencing equation? At what point should prior misconduct cease to count for the purposes of fresh sentencing? Should similar previous convictions count more than convictions unrelated to the current offence? Statutory sentencing regimes around the world incorporate provisions which mandate harsher treatment of repeat offenders. Although there is an extensive literature on the definition and use of criminal history information, the emphasis here, as befits a volume in the series, is on the theoretical and normative aspects of considering previous convictions at sentencing. Several authors explore the theory underlying the practice of mitigating the punishments for first offenders, while others put forth arguments for enhancing sentences for recidivists. The practice of sentencing repeat offenders in two jurisdictions (England and Wales, and Sweden) is also examined in detail 410 0$aStudies in penal theory and penal ethics. 606 $aSentences (Criminal procedure) 606 $2Sentencing & punishment 606 $aRecidivism$xPrevention 606 $aRecidivists 606 $aSentences (Criminal procedure)$zEngland 606 $aSentences (Criminal procedures)$zWales 606 $aRecidivism$zEngland$xPrevention 606 $aRecidivism$zWales$xPrevention 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aSentences (Criminal procedure) 615 0$aRecidivism$xPrevention. 615 0$aRecidivists. 615 0$aSentences (Criminal procedure) 615 0$aSentences (Criminal procedures) 615 0$aRecidivism$xPrevention. 615 0$aRecidivism$xPrevention. 676 $a345.0772 702 $aRoberts$b Julian V. 702 $aVon Hirsch$b Andrew 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910459910003321 996 $aPrevious convictions at sentencing$92458914 997 $aUNINA