LEADER 02453nam 2200589 450 001 9910459848903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-59332-792-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000000259936 035 $a(EBL)1812569 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001349821 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12433439 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001349821 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11402918 035 $a(PQKB)10131154 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1812569 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1812569 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10951599 035 $a(OCoLC)892910414 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000259936 100 $a20141018h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDialogue among state supreme courts $eadvancing state constitutionalism /$fMark W. Denniston 210 1$aEl Paso, Texas :$cLFB Scholarly Publishing LLC,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (231 p.) 225 0 $aLaw and Society : Recent Scholarship 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-59332-759-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aState supreme courts use state constitutional provisions to afford their citizens state constitutional rights beyond the protections that the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the U.S. Constitution to require. As state supreme courts consider expanding state constitutional rights they engage in an ongoing dialogue with their sister state supreme courts. Results indicate this dialogue amongst state supreme courts influences decisions interpreting state constitutional rights. Denniston demonstrates through analysis of state supreme court decisions and interviews with state supreme court justice 410 0$aLaw and Society 606 $aConstitutional law$zUnited States$xStates$vCases 606 $aCourts of last resort$zUnited States$xStates 606 $aJudicial process$zUnited States$xStates 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aConstitutional law$xStates 615 0$aCourts of last resort$xStates. 615 0$aJudicial process$xStates. 676 $a342.7308 700 $aDenniston$b Mark W.$f1975-$0871250 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910459848903321 996 $aDialogue among state supreme courts$91944930 997 $aUNINA