LEADER 02232nam  2200565   450 
001 9910459625203321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-4438-6945-7
035   $a(CKB)3710000000261442
035   $a(EBL)1819191
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001411121
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11889081
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001411121
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11401759
035   $a(PQKB)10143574
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1819191
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1819191
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10955453
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL652905
035   $a(OCoLC)893739490
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000261442
100   $a20141030h20142014  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aKant's B. Deduction /$fby Mario Caimi
210  1$aNewcastle upon Tyne, England :$cCambridge Scholars Publishing,$d2014.
210  4$dİ2014
215   $a1 online resource (154 p.)
225 0 $aKantian Questions
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-4438-6537-0 
311   $a1-322-21625-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aTABLE OF CONTENTS; PREFACE [TO THE FRENCH EDITION]; FOREWORD; ABBREVIATIONS; INTRODUCTION; CHAPTER ONE; CHAPTER TWO; CHAPTER THREE; CONCLUSIONS; BIBLIOGRAPHY
330   $aThis book is organized as a commentary following the text of the B-Transcendental Deduction line by line. In so doing, it becomes evident that each step of the Deduction necessarily follows from the preceding step and is grounded in it, although not in the way the steps of a formal-logic deduction are. The primary hypothesis of this book is that the succession of steps is but the unfolding of the Principle of Apperception. The commentary assumes that the entire argument of the B-Deduction con...
606   $aRepresentation (Philosophy)
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aRepresentation (Philosophy)
676   $a193
700   $aCaimi$b Mario$0865822
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910459625203321
996   $aKant's B. Deduction$91932247
997   $aUNINA