LEADER 05601nam 2200685Ia 450 001 9910459485703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-97696-6 010 $a9786612976964 010 $a90-272-8846-1 035 $a(CKB)2670000000059706 035 $a(EBL)623311 035 $a(OCoLC)697609339 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000472421 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11280650 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000472421 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10434660 035 $a(PQKB)11331916 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC623311 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL623311 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10436128 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL297696 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000059706 100 $a20100923d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aProsody in interaction$b[electronic resource] /$fedited by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, Margret Selting 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub. Co.$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (428 p.) 225 1 $aStudies in discourse and grammar ;$vv. 23 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-2633-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aProsody in Interaction; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Foreword; References; Preface; The contributions to this volume; The event inspiring this volume; Acknowledgements; References; List of contributors; Introduction; Prosody in interaction; Introduction and overview; 1. What is prosody?; 2. Why should scholars and students concerned with the analysis of conversation or interaction study prosody?; 2.1 The construction of units; 2.2 The construction of multi-unit turns; 2.3 The organization of turn-taking; 2.4 The construction of actions 327 $a2.5 The contextualization of genres (kommunikative Gattungen), modalities, styles, emotive involvement etc.3 Why should phoneticians and phonologists study the forms and uses and/or functions of prosody in interaction?; 3.1 New technological possibilities allow new methodologies in research on prosody; 3.2 Limitations of some other approaches' preference of more idealized data; 3.3 Some advantages of starting from natural data in the first place; 4. Who studies prosody in interaction currently in what way?; 4.1 Approaches; 4.2 Methodological principles 327 $a5. What are our current research questions and our future tasks in research on prosody?5.1 Prosody in the organization of natural interaction; 5.2 Prosody and grammar/syntax in conversation; 5.3 Prosody and semantics: Signaling of information structure; 5.4 Prosody and language variation/language comparison/typology; 5.5 Prosody in conversation with specific kinds of participants; 5.6 Prosody and the contextualization of affect; 5.7 Prosody and the multimodality of interaction; 6. What are the challenges of research in prosody and interaction that we still need to come to terms with? 327 $a6.1 General problems6.2 Specific open questions; 7. Conclusions; References; Future prospects of research on prosody: The need for publicly available corpora; 1. Publicly available corpora: Pros and cons; 2. Criteria for the design of publicly available corpora; 3. The adequate level of detail of transcription in publicly available corpora; References; Part I. Prosody and other levels of linguistic organization in interaction; The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice; 1. Introduction; 2. Phonetic analysis; 2.1 Duration; 2.2 Juncture; 2.3 Pitch; 2.4 Summary 327 $a3. Sequential organisation4. Summary and implications; References; Appendix: Transcription conventions; Rush-throughs as social action; 1. Rush-throughs as a "kind of bridging between TCUs"; 2. Convergences of phonetic and conversation-analytic work: Gareth Walker's promising analysis; 3. Phonetics and beyond: Rush-throughs as social actions; References; Prosodic constructions in making complaints; 1. Constructing turns at talk; 2. Complaining and complaints; 2.1 Data; 3. Overview of A-complaints; 4. Analysis of data fragments; 4.1 A-Complaints which get affiliative responses 327 $a4.2 Reformulation of the complaint after a non-affiliative response 330 $aDespite a vocabulary that consists of only three words Yes, No and And, Chil acts as a powerful speaker in conversation. He does this, embedding his limited lexicon within larger contextual configurations in which different kinds of meaning making processes including prosody, gesture, sequential organization, and operations on his talk by his interlocutors create a whole that goes beyond any of its constitutive parts. This paper explores the role played by prosody in this process. It focuses on how Chil is able to build varied action that is precisely fitted to its local environment by using d 410 0$aStudies in discourse and grammar ;$vv. 23. 606 $aProsodic analysis (Linguistics) 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xPhonology 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aProsodic analysis (Linguistics) 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xPhonology. 676 $a414/.6 701 $aBarth-Weingarten$b Dagmar$f1971-$0933731 701 $aReber$b Elisabeth$0933732 701 $aSelting$b Margret$0158695 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910459485703321 996 $aProsody in interaction$92102077 997 $aUNINA