LEADER 03247nam  22006253u 450 
001 9910459292203321
005 20210113173003.0
010   $a1-282-53991-4
010   $a9786612539916
010   $a0-253-00407-1
035   $a(CKB)2670000000014155
035   $a(EBL)501437
035   $a(OCoLC)607554424
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000357738
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11278825
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000357738
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10354257
035   $a(PQKB)10135894
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC501437
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000014155
100   $a20151005d2010      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aChieftaincy, the state, and democracy$b[electronic resource] $epolitical legitimacy in post-apartheid South Africa /$fJ. Michael Williams
210   $aBloomington $cIndiana University Press$d2009
215   $a1 online resource (300 p.) $cmap
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-253-35418-8 
327   $a""Contents""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Abbreviations""; ""1. Introduction: The Chieftaincy, the State, and the Desire to Dominate""; ""2. The Binding Together of the People: The Historical Development of the Chieftaincy and the Principle of Unity""; ""3. The Making of a Mixed Polity: The Accommodation and Transformation of the Chieftaincy""; ""4. The Contested Nature of Politics, Democracy, and Rights in Rural South Africa""; ""5. The Chieftaincy and the Establishment of Local Government: Multiple Boundaries and the Ambiguities of Representation""
327   $a""6. The Chieftaincy and Development: Expanding the Parameters of Tradition""""7. Legitimacy Lost? The Fall of a Chief and the Survival of a Chieftaincy""; ""8. Conclusion: The Chieftaincy and the Post-Apartheid State: Legitimacy and Democracy in a Mixed Polity""; ""Notes""; ""Bibliography""; ""Index""
330   $aAs South Africa consolidates its democracy, chieftaincy has remained a controversial and influential institution that has adapted to recent changes. J. Michael Williams examines the chieftaincy and how it has sought to assert its power since the end of apartheid. By taking local-level politics seriously and looking closely at how chiefs negotiate the new political order, Williams takes a position between those who see the chieftaincy as an indigenous democratic form deserving recognition and protection, a
606   $aChiefdoms$zSouth Africa
606   $aLocal government$zSouth Africa
606   $aDemocracy$zSouth Africa
606   $aPost-apartheid era$zSouth Africa
607   $aSouth Africa$xSocial conditions$y1994-
607   $aSouth Africa$xPolitics and government$y1994-
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aChiefdoms
615  0$aLocal government
615  0$aDemocracy
615  0$aPost-apartheid era
676   $a321/.10968
700   $aWilliams$b J. Michael$g(James Michael),$01040556
801  0$bAU-PeEL
801  1$bAU-PeEL
801  2$bAU-PeEL
801  2$bCaOLU
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910459292203321
996   $aChieftaincy, the state, and democracy$92463521
997   $aUNINA