LEADER 04111nam  22007812  450 
001 9910459252303321
005 20220207173709.0
010   $a0-511-86177-X
010   $a1-107-21925-6
010   $a1-283-00613-8
010   $a9786613006134
010   $a0-511-86022-6
010   $a0-511-86109-5
010   $a0-511-85848-5
010   $a0-511-85761-6
010   $a0-511-78165-2
010   $a0-511-85935-X
035   $a(CKB)2560000000059719
035   $a(EBL)615771
035   $a(OCoLC)703137556
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000472769
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11325187
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000472769
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10436149
035   $a(PQKB)11233467
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511781650
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC615771
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL615771
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10449290
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL300613
035   $a(EXLCZ)992560000000059719
100   $a20100519d2011||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aRethinking the judicial settlement of Reconstruction /$fPamela Brandwein$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2011.
215   $a1 online resource (xi, 269 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge studies on the American Constitution
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a1-107-62591-2 
311   $a0-521-88771-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aAbandoned Blacks? -- The emergence of the concept of state neglect, 1867-1873 -- The civil/social distinction : an intramural Republican dispute -- The birth of state action doctrine, 1874-1876 -- A surviving sectional context, 1876-1891 -- The Civil Rights Cases and the language of state neglect -- Definitive judicial abandonment, 1896-1906 -- Twentieth-century receptions -- Conclusion.
330   $aAmerican constitutional lawyers and legal historians routinely assert that the Supreme Court's state action doctrine halted Reconstruction in its tracks. But it didn't. Rethinking the Judicial Settlement of Reconstruction demolishes the conventional wisdom - and puts a constructive alternative in its place. Pamela Brandwein unveils a lost jurisprudence of rights that provided expansive possibilities for protecting blacks' physical safety and electoral participation, even as it left public accommodation rights undefended. She shows that the Supreme Court supported a Republican coalition and left open ample room for executive and legislative action. Blacks were abandoned, but by the president and Congress, not the Court. Brandwein unites close legal reading of judicial opinions (some hitherto unknown), sustained historical work, the study of political institutions, and the sociology of knowledge. This book explodes tired old debates and will provoke new ones.
410  0$aCambridge studies on the American Constitution.
606   $aCivil rights$zUnited States$xStates$xHistory
606   $aBlack people$xLegal status, laws, etc$zUnited States$xStates$xHistory
606   $aDiscrimination$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States$xStates$xHistory
606   $aCivil rights$zUnited States$xHistory
606   $aDiscrimination$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States$xHistory
606   $aReconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877)
615  0$aCivil rights$xStates$xHistory.
615  0$aBlack people$xLegal status, laws, etc.$xStates$xHistory.
615  0$aDiscrimination$xLaw and legislation$xStates$xHistory.
615  0$aCivil rights$xHistory.
615  0$aDiscrimination$xLaw and legislation$xHistory.
615  0$aReconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877)
676   $a342.7308/73
700   $aBrandwein$b Pamela$01055576
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910459252303321
996   $aRethinking the judicial settlement of Reconstruction$92489111
997   $aUNINA