LEADER 02348nam  2200649Ia 450 
001 9910458524803321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-19-756118-7
010   $a1-280-76154-7
010   $a9786610761548
010   $a0-19-535360-9
035   $a(CKB)1000000000403639
035   $a(EBL)431172
035   $a(OCoLC)434890972
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000235216
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11205487
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000235216
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10246705
035   $a(PQKB)11372236
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC431172
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0002342117
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL431172
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10329649
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL76154
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000403639
100   $a19980403d1999      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe rejection of continental drift$b[electronic resource] $etheory and method in American earth science /$fNaomi Oreskes
210   $aNew York $cOxford University Press$d1999
215   $a1 online resource (433 p.)
225 1 $aOxford scholarship online
300   $aPreviously issued in print: 1999.
311   $a0-19-511732-8 
311   $a0-19-511733-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 371-403) and index.
327   $aContents; Introduction: The Instability of Scientific Truth; I: Not the Mechanism; II: Theory and Method; III: A Revolution in Acceptance; Epilogue: Utility and Truth; Notes; Bibliography; Index
330 8 $aWhy did American geologists reject the notion of continental drift, first posed in 1915? And why did British scientists view the theory as a pleasing confirmation? This text, based on archival resources, provides answers to these questions.
410  0$aOxford scholarship online.
606   $aContinental drift
606   $aGeology$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aContinental drift.
615  0$aGeology$xHistory
676   $a551.136
676   $a551.13601
700   $aOreskes$b Naomi$0793631
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910458524803321
996   $aThe rejection of continental drift$92105064
997   $aUNINA