LEADER 00799nam0-22002771i-450- 001 990006263490403321 005 19980601 035 $a000626349 035 $aFED01000626349 035 $a(Aleph)000626349FED01 035 $a000626349 100 $a19980601d1970----km-y0itay50------ba 105 $a--------00-yy 200 1 $aState Department, Press and Pressure Groups$eA Role-Analysis$fWilliam O. Chittick. 210 $aNew York$cWiley Interscience$d1970 215 $aVIII,, 373 p.$d24 cm 676 $a350 700 1$aChittick,$bWilliam O.$0236820 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990006263490403321 952 $aI N 71$b98646$fFGBC 959 $aFGBC 996 $aState Department, Press and Pressure Groups$9638507 997 $aUNINA DB $aGIU01 LEADER 00912nam0-22003131i-450- 001 990007862240403321 005 20050411101432.0 010 $a9516347932 035 $a000786224 035 $aFED01000786224 035 $a(Aleph)000786224FED01 035 $a000786224 100 $a20040312d2001----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $afin 102 $aFI 105 $ay----n--001yy 200 1 $a<>concept of minority in international law$ea critical study of the vital elements$fEyassu Gayim 210 $aRovaniemi$cUniversity of Lapland Press$d2001 215 $aVI, VI, 140 p.$d25 cm 225 1 $aJuridica lapponica 676 $a323$v22$zeng 700 1$aGayim,$bEyassu$0241040 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990007862240403321 952 $aH 256$b3213$fDSI 959 $aDSI 996 $aConcept of minority in international law$9673585 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04369nam 2200745 450 001 9910458431203321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-262-28875-3 010 $a1-282-97847-0 010 $a9786612978470 010 $a0-262-28968-7 024 3 $a9780262289689 035 $a(CKB)2560000000054103 035 $a(OCoLC)699488887 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10433732 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000466882 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11316883 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000466882 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10466690 035 $a(PQKB)11037734 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000131138 035 $a(CaBNVSL)mat06267483 035 $a(IDAMS)0b000064818b44d5 035 $a(IEEE)6267483 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3339189 035 $a(OCoLC)699488887$z(OCoLC)693533013$z(OCoLC)732282575$z(OCoLC)773583464$z(OCoLC)816637622$z(OCoLC)961538558$z(OCoLC)962633671$z(OCoLC)974442872$z(OCoLC)974518987$z(OCoLC)982315921$z(OCoLC)988485741$z(OCoLC)991920756$z(OCoLC)1055360879$z(OCoLC)1058120074$z(OCoLC)1064002299$z(OCoLC)1081191055 035 $a(OCoLC-P)699488887 035 $a(MaCbMITP)8199 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3339189 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10433732 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL297847 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000054103 100 $a20151223d2010 uy 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAmerica identified $ebiometric technology and society /$fLisa S. Nelson 210 1$aCambridge, Massachusetts :$cMIT Press,$dc2011. 210 2$a[Piscataqay, New Jersey] :$cIEEE Xplore,$d[2010] 215 $a1 online resource (267 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-262-01477-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aModern identification -- September 11 -- Privacy and biometric technology -- Anonymity -- Trust and confidence -- Paternalism -- Conclusion. 330 $aThe use of biometric technology for identification has gone from Orwellian fantasy to everyday reality. This technology, which verifies or recognizes a person's identity based on physiological, anatomical, or behavioral patterns (including fingerprints, retina, handwriting, and keystrokes) has been deployed for such purposes as combating welfare fraud, screening airplane passengers, and identifying terrorists. The accompanying controversy has pitted those who praise the technology's accuracy and efficiency against advocates for privacy and civil liberties. In America Identified, Lisa Nelson investigates the complex public responses to biometric technology. She uses societal perceptions of this particular identification technology to explore the values, beliefs, and ideologies that influence public acceptance of technology. Drawing on her own extensive research with focus groups and a national survey, Nelson finds that considerations of privacy, anonymity, trust and confidence in institutions, and the legitimacy of paternalistic government interventions are extremely important to users and potential users of the technology. She examines the long history of government systems of identification and the controversies they have inspired; the effect of the information technology revolution and the events of September 11, 2001; the normative value of privacy (as opposed to its merely legal definition); the place of surveillance technologies in a civil society; trust in government and distrust in the expanded role of government; and the balance between the need for government to act to prevent harm and the possible threat to liberty in government's actions. 606 $aTechnological innovations$xSocial aspects 606 $aBiometric identification 606 $aPrivacy, Right of 606 $aSocial interaction$xTechnological innovations 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aTechnological innovations$xSocial aspects. 615 0$aBiometric identification. 615 0$aPrivacy, Right of. 615 0$aSocial interaction$xTechnological innovations. 676 $a303.48/3 700 $aNelson$b Lisa S.$g(Lisa Sue)$0993372 801 0$bCaBNVSL 801 1$bCaBNVSL 801 2$bCaBNVSL 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910458431203321 996 $aAmerica identified$92274496 997 $aUNINA