LEADER 01926nam  2200445   450 
001 9910458350403321
005 20201110145615.0
010   $a1-4843-4696-3
035   $a(CKB)2550000001312891
035   $a(EBL)1701824
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1701824
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1701824
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL616092
035   $a(OCoLC)881416260
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001312891
100   $a20201110d2013      uy             0
101 0 $aara
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aEnergy subsidy reform $elessons and implications /$fenedict J. Clements
210  1$aWashington, District of Columbia :$cInternational Monetary Fund,$d2013.
215   $a1 online resource (195 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-4843-8992-1 
311   $a1-306-84841-5 
330   $aEnergy subsidies have wide-ranging economic consequences. Although they are aimed at protecting consumers, subsidies aggravate fiscal imbalances, crowd out priority public spending, and depress private investment, including in the energy sector. Subsidies also distort resource allocation by encouraging excessive energy consumption, artificially promoting capital-intensive industries, reducing incentives for investment in renewable energy, and accelerating the depletion of natural resources. Most subsidy benefits are captured by higher-income households, reinforcing inequality. Even future gene
606   $aElectric utilities$xGovernment policy
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aElectric utilities$xGovernment policy.
676   $a338.436626
700   $aClements$b Benedict J.$0122914
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910458350403321
996   $aEnergy subsidy reform$91909182
997   $aUNINA