LEADER 03283nam  2200601Ia 450 
001 9910458335703321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-282-63829-7
010   $a9786612638299
010   $a0-262-26609-1
035   $a(CKB)2560000000014308
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000429308
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11249699
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000429308
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10430281
035   $a(PQKB)10913528
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3339124
035   $a(OCoLC)646068759$z(OCoLC)608376559$z(OCoLC)620103778$z(OCoLC)647923447$z(OCoLC)743201095$z(OCoLC)747305675$z(OCoLC)763093347$z(OCoLC)816563050$z(OCoLC)961604459$z(OCoLC)962611178$z(OCoLC)966248267$z(OCoLC)971458256$z(OCoLC)975598694$z(OCoLC)988459068$z(OCoLC)991995007$z(OCoLC)992003039$z(OCoLC)994497961$z(OCoLC)1011934055$z(OCoLC)1017998398$z(OCoLC)1037943840$z(OCoLC)1038662962$z(OCoLC)1042321820$z(OCoLC)1045535003$z(OCoLC)1066440692$z(OCoLC)1081216783
035   $a(OCoLC-P)646068759
035   $a(MaCbMITP)8694
035   $a(PPN)170260275
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3339124
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10384054
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL263829
035   $a(OCoLC)646068759
035   $a(EXLCZ)992560000000014308
100   $a20100107d2010      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aTaking economics seriously$b[electronic resource] /$fDean Baker
210   $aCambridge, MA $cMIT Press$dc2010
215   $a87 p
225 1 $aA Boston review book
300   $a"A Boston Review Book."
311   $a0-262-01418-1 
330   $a'There is nothing wrong with economics, Dean Baker contends, but economists routinely ignore their own principles when it comes to economic policy. What would policy look like if we took basic principles of mainstream economics seriously and applied them consistently? In the debate over regulation, for example, Baker--one of the few economists who predicted the meltdown of fall 2008--points out that ideological blinders have obscured the fact there is no "free market" to protect. Modern markets are highly regulated, although intrusive regulations such as copyright and patents are rarely viewed as regulatory devices. If we admit the extent to which the economy is and will be regulated, we have many more options in designing policy and deciding who benefits from it. On health care reform, Baker complains that economists ignore another basic idea: marginal cost pricing. Unlike all other industries, medical services are priced extraordinarily high, far above the cost of production, yet that discrepancy is rarely addressed in the debate about health care reform. What if we applied marginal cost pricing--making doctors' wages competitive and charging less for prescription drugs and tests such as MRIs? ..."--Product Description.
606   $aEconomics
606   $aSocial sciences
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aEconomics.
615  0$aSocial sciences.
676   $a330
700   $aBaker$b Dean$f1958-$01044513
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910458335703321
996   $aTaking economics seriously$92470225
997   $aUNINA