LEADER 03336nam  2200625Ia 450 
001 9910458224803321
005 20210518021033.0
010   $a0-8047-7430-7
024 7 $a10.1515/9780804774307
035   $a(CKB)2560000000011471
035   $a(EBL)537852
035   $a(OCoLC)638861382
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000415153
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12173976
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000415153
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10409779
035   $a(PQKB)11773994
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC537852
035   $a(DE-B1597)564610
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780804774307
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL537852
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10392272
035   $a(OCoLC)1178769597
035   $a(EXLCZ)992560000000011471
100   $a20090720d2010      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n#---|u||u
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aCritical excess$b[electronic resource] $eoverreading in Derrida, Deleuze, Levinas, Z?iz?ek and Cavell /$fColin Davis
210   $aStanford, CA $cStanford University Press$dc2010
215   $a1 online resource (235 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 0 $a0-8047-6306-2 
311 0 $a0-8047-6307-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFront matter --$tContents --$tAcknowledgments --$tPreface --$t1 The Ancient Quarrel: Philosophy and Literature --$t2 Derrida, Hermeneutics and Deconstruction --$t3 Deleuze: Against Interpretation --$t4 Levinas and the Resistance to Reading --$t5 ?i?ek?s Idiotic Enjoyment --$t6 Cavell and the Claim of Reading --$t7 Conclusion: In Praise of Overreading --$tNotes --$tBibliography --$tIndex
330   $aThe "ancient quarrel" between philosophy and literature seems to have been resolved once and for all with the recognition that philosophy and the arts may be allies instead of enemies. Critical Excess examines in detail the work of five thinkers who have had a huge, ongoing impact on the study of literature and film: Jacques Derrida, Gilles Deleuze, Emmanuel Levinas, Slavoj ?i?ek, and Stanley Cavell. Their approaches are very different from one another, but they each make unexpected interpretive leaps that render their readings exhilarating and unnerving. But do they go too far? Does a scribbled note left behind by Nietzsche really tell us about the nature of textuality? Can Hitchcock truly tell you "everything you always wanted to know about Lacan"? Does the blanket hung up in a motel room invoke the Kantian divide between the knowable phenomenal world and the unknowable things in themselves? Contextualizing the work of the five thinkers in the intellectual debates to which they contribute, this book analyzes the stakes and advantages of "overreading."
606   $aCriticism
606   $aLiterature$xPhilosophy
606   $aLiterature$xHistory and criticism$xTheory, etc
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aCriticism.
615  0$aLiterature$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aLiterature$xHistory and criticism$xTheory, etc.
676   $a801/.95
700   $aDavis$b Colin$f1960-$0858026
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910458224803321
996   $aCritical excess$92472942
997   $aUNINA