LEADER 03985nam  2200649 a 450 
001 9910457895703321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-283-35919-7
010   $a9786613359193
010   $a90-272-7963-2
035   $a(CKB)2550000000074663
035   $a(EBL)805847
035   $a(OCoLC)769342241
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001101514
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11731111
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001101514
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11068344
035   $a(PQKB)10965837
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC805847
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL805847
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10517113
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL335919
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000074663
100   $a19851022d1985      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aTheoretical aspects of passivization in the framework of applicative grammar$b[electronic resource] /$fJean-Pierre Descle?s, Zlatka Guentche?va, Sebastian Shaumyan
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins Pub. Co.$d1985
215   $a1 online resource (123 p.)
225 1 $aPragmatics & beyond,$x0166-6258 ;$v6:1
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a90-272-2543-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aTHEORETICAL ASPECTS OF PASSIVIZATION IN THE FRAMEWORK OF APPLICATIVE GRAMMAR; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; 1. INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND AND GOALS; 2. AN OUTLINE OF APPLICATIVE GRAMMAR; 3. PASSIVIZATION AND APPLICATIVE GRAMMAR; 4. THE CLASSICAL CONVERSION HYPOTHESIS; 5. APPLICATIVE GRAMMAR AND HIERARCHICAL THEORIES; 6. ARGUMENTS FOR THE ABSTRACT CONVERSION HYPOTHESIS; 6.1 The problem of the active-passive relation; 6.2 The problem of agented-agentless relations; 6.3 Unspecified term in passive constructions
327   $a6.4 'By' as a transposer of a term in passive constructions6.5 The significance of the converse predicate; 7. A GENERALIZATION OF THE NOTIONS OF TRANSITIVE AND INTRANSITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS; 7.1 Non-universality of the notions of subject and direct object; 7.2 A uniform definition of passive and antipassive constructions; 7.3 The grammatical and lexical notions of agent; 8. A FORMAL THEORY OF PASSIVIZATION; 8.1 The notion of type; 8.2 Agentless and agented passive constructions; 8.3 Formal reduction from the agented passive construction; 8.4 Intransitive passive constructions
327   $a8.5 Impersonal passive constructions8.6 Passivization of the tertiary term; 9. CONCLUSION: FUNDAMENTAL FUNCTION OF PASSIVIZATION; APPENDIX. SOME COMBINATORS USED IN LINGUISTICS; REFERENCES
330   $aPassivization is explained by using the formalism of combinatory logic. The agented passive is derived from the agentless as follows: a term denoting an agent is transposed into a predicate modifier and applied to the passive predicate of the agentless construction. The passive predicate consists of two parts: 1) the two-place converse of the active predicate and 2) a zero unspecified term to which the converse predicate is applied. The passive is not derived from but is related to the active. The modifier of the passive predicate is the functional counterpart of the subject in the active. The
410  0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$v6:1.
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xPassive voice
606   $aApplicative grammar
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xPassive voice.
615  0$aApplicative grammar.
676   $a415
700   $aDescle?s$b J. P$0918170
701   $aGuentche?va$b Zlatka$0918171
701   $aShaumyan$b Sebastian$0220042
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910457895703321
996   $aTheoretical aspects of passivization in the framework of applicative grammar$92058639
997   $aUNINA