LEADER 04040nam 2200697 a 450 001 9910457812803321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-283-42623-4 010 $a9786613426239 010 $a90-04-21853-X 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004218536 035 $a(CKB)2550000000079208 035 $a(EBL)842214 035 $a(OCoLC)773566760 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000589596 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12272740 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000589596 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10656670 035 $a(PQKB)11249550 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC842214 035 $a(OCoLC)778435013 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004218536 035 $a(PPN)174402902 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL842214 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10525099 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL342623 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000079208 100 $a20111005d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aNecessity and national emergency clauses$b[electronic resource] $esovereignty in modern treaty interpretation /$fby Diane A. Desierto 210 $aLeiden, The Netherlands $cMartinus Nijhoff Publishers$d2012 215 $a1 online resource (432 p.) 225 1 $aInternational litigation in practice,$x1874-0502 ;$vv. 3 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-04-21852-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aPreliminary Material -- Introduction -- The Doctrine of Necessity in Municipal and International Legal Orders -- The Historical Genesis of Necessity Doctrine: -- Substantive and Methodological Issues in Interpreting Necessity Clauses in Treaties: -- Economic and National Security Emergencies: -- States of Emergency in International Human Rights Treaties -- Misapplying Necessity: -- Conclusion: -- Selected Bibliography -- Subject Index. 330 $aStates invoke economic crises and security threats to justify treaty non-compliance. The most dramatic recent examples of this phenomenon include ?necessity? defences in international investment law; ?emergency? derogations in international human rights treaties; ?exceptions? for non-conforming measures in international trade law; and doctrinal misapplications of necessity in jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Necessity and National Emergency Clauses is the first to trace the doctrine?s genealogy from medieval Christian and Islamic religious history to post-Westphalian practices, the International Law Commission?s codifications, and modern treaty formulations. Recognizing the doctrine?s thematic linkage with the State?s sovereign right to delimit international obligation, the volume proposes analytical criteria to assess the lawfulness and legitimacy of interpretations of necessity and national emergency clauses within specialized treaty regimes. This volume is intended for law students, legal scholars, arbitrators, international judges, and other international law practitioners interested in deriving interpretive solutions to treaty controversies on the doctrine of necessity. Diane Desierto was awarded the 2010-2011 Ambrose Gherini Prize, the highest prize awarded in the field of International Law by Yale Law School, for her JSD dissertation, upon which this book is based. 410 0$aInternational litigation in practice ;$vv. 3. 606 $aNecessity (International law) 606 $aTreaties$xInterpretation and construction 606 $aClauses (Law) 606 $aSovereignty 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aNecessity (International law) 615 0$aTreaties$xInterpretation and construction. 615 0$aClauses (Law) 615 0$aSovereignty. 676 $a341.3/7 700 $aDesierto$b Diane A$0763962 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910457812803321 996 $aNecessity and national emergency clauses$91550565 997 $aUNINA