LEADER 06253nam 2200793 a 450 001 9910457777303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-283-31226-3 010 $a9786613312266 010 $a90-272-7564-5 035 $a(CKB)2550000000063695 035 $a(EBL)794771 035 $a(OCoLC)772441239 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000980171 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11525221 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000980171 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10958259 035 $a(PQKB)11730668 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC794771 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL794771 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10509577 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000063695 100 $a19981008d1998 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 15$aThe "broken" plural problem in Arabic and comparative Semitic$b[electronic resource] $eallomorphy and analogy in non-concatenative morphology /$fRobert R. Ratcliffe 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins$d1998 215 $a1 online resource (273 p.) 225 1 $aAmsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory,$x0304-0763 ;$vv. 168 300 $aRevision of the first volume of the author's dissertation (doctoral--Yale University). 311 $a90-272-3673-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aTHE ""BROKEN"" PLURAL PROBLEM IN ARABIC AND COMPARATIVE SEMITIC ALLOMORPHY AND ANALOGY IN NON-CONCATENATIVE MORPHOLOGY; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; FOREWORD; NOTE ON TRANSCRIPTION/TRANSLITERATION; CHAPTER I. METHODOLOGICAL PRELIMINARIES; 1. General aims of diachronic linguistics; 2. Diachronic investigation in morphology; 3. Notes on reconstructive method I: Establishing the data; 3.1 Distributional analysis and internal reconstruction; 3.2 Establishing correspondences among languages; 4. Notes on reconstructive method II: Evaluating hypotheses 327 $a4.1 Evaluating allomorphic variationCHAPTER II. MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF ARABIC; 1. Basic issues; 2. Morphological rules and relationships in Arabic; 2.1 Autosegmental morphology; 2.2 Problems with templates; 2.3 Morphological rule types; 2.4 Templatic and affixational morphology revisited: Templates as constraints; 3. Organization of the lexicon; 3.1 The form of lexical entries; 3.2 Levels; 4. Low-level phonological effects on morphology; 4.1 Syllable structure constraints; 4.2 Epenthesis and glide formation; 4.3 Syncope and glide deletion; CHAPTER III. THE ARABIC NOUN PLURAL SYSTEM 327 $a1. General aims2. Observations on productivity and regularity; 3. Analysis by singular-plural groups; 3.1 Group (1): underived masculine nouns of three or fewer consonants; 3.2 Group (2): triconsonantal and shorter feminine nouns; 3.3 Group (3): quadriconsonantal nouns; 3.4 Group (4): three-consonant stems with long vowel treated as four-consonant stems; 3.5 Group (5): the problem of derivation of derived forms I: the active participle CaaCiC; 3.6 Group (6): the problem of derivation of derived forms II: verbal adjectives and nouns (CaCiiC, CVCaaC, etc.) 327 $a3.7 A general account of groups (4), (5), and (6)3.8 Group (7): special adjectival types; 3.9 Form and distribution of the 'sound' external plural; 3.10 Synopsis of the Arabic level I plural system; CHAPTER IV. HISTORY OF THE BROKEN PLURAL PROBLEM WITHIN THE COMPARATIVE SEMITIC TRADITION; 1. Overview; 2. The major theories; 2.1 Brockelmann (1913); 2.2 Barth (1894); 2.3 Kury?owicz (1962, 1973); 2.4 Murtonen (1964); 2.5 Corriente (1971); 3. The major theories considered against the Arabic data; 3.1 Plurals of underived masculines (Group 1): CiCaaC, ?aCCaaC, CuCuuC, ?aCCuC 327 $a3.2 Plurals of underived feminines (Group 2): CVCaC, CiCaaC, CVCaCaat3.3 Group (3) and group (4) plurals: CaCaaCiC(at); CaCaa?iC, CawaaCiC, etc.; 3.4 Group (5) plurals: CuCCaC, CuCCaaC, CaCaCat, CuCa(C)at; 3.5 Group (6) plurals: CuCuC, ?aCCiCat, ?aCCiCaa?, CuCaCaa?; 3.6 Group (7): special adjective types; 4. Conclusion from study of previous scholarship; CHAPTER V. THE COMPARATIVE SEMITIC EVIDENCE; 1. Diachronic problems presented by the plural systems of Semitic languages; 1.1 The broken plural and the sub-classification of Semitic languages; 2. Noun pluralization in East Semitic 327 $a3. Noun pluralization in Northwest Semitic. 330 $aThe formal aspects of non-concatenative morphology have received considerable attention in recent years, but the diachronic dimensions of such systems have been little explored. The current work applies a modern methodological and theoretical framework to a classic problem in Arabic and Semitic historical linguistics: the highly allomorphic system of 'stem-internal' or 'broken' plurals. It shows that widely-accepted views regarding the historical development of this system are untenable and offers a new hypothesis.The first chapter lays out a methodology for comparative-historical resear 410 0$aAmsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science.$nSeries IV,$pCurrent issues in linguistic theory ;$vv. 168. 606 $aArabic language$xMorphology 606 $aArabic language$xMorphophonemics 606 $aArabic language$xNumber 606 $aArabic language$xNoun 606 $aSemitic languages$xMorphology 606 $aSemitic languages$xMorphophonemics 606 $aSemitic languages$xNumber 606 $aSemitic languages$xNoun 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aArabic language$xMorphology. 615 0$aArabic language$xMorphophonemics. 615 0$aArabic language$xNumber. 615 0$aArabic language$xNoun. 615 0$aSemitic languages$xMorphology. 615 0$aSemitic languages$xMorphophonemics. 615 0$aSemitic languages$xNumber. 615 0$aSemitic languages$xNoun. 676 $a492.7/5 700 $aRatcliffe$b Robert R$0662569 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910457777303321 996 $aThe "broken" plural problem in Arabic and comparative Semitic$92156353 997 $aUNINA