LEADER 03290nam  2200613 a 450 
001 9910457711303321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-283-31298-0
010   $a9786613312983
010   $a90-272-7699-4
035   $a(CKB)2550000000062998
035   $a(EBL)793536
035   $a(OCoLC)759101340
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000535272
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11364422
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000535272
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10536481
035   $a(PQKB)10946921
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC793536
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL793536
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10508950
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL331298
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000062998
100   $a19920928d1993      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aComplex verb formation$b[electronic resource] /$fD. Gary Miller
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins$d1993
215   $a1 online resource (401 p.)
225 1 $aAmsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory,$x0304-0763 ;$vv. 95
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a90-272-3595-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [327]-369) and indexes.
327   $aCOMPLEX VERB FORMATION; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Acknowledgements; ABBREVIATIONS; Table of contents; PREFACE; 1. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT MORPHOLOGY; 2. THEORIES OF VERBAL MORPHEME ORDER; 3. PRINCIPLES AND PARAMETERS IN MORPHOLOGY; 4 THE FP HYPOTHESIS, COMPOUNDING, AND INCORPORATION; 5. PREPOSITION INCORPORATION; 6. GRAMMATICAL FUNCTION CHANGING PROCESSES; 7. PASSIVE, MIDDLE, AND ERGATIVE; 8. REFLEXIVE AND RECIPROCAL VERBS; 9. REFLEXIVE INCORPORATION AND ITS DISAPPEARANCE IN SCANDINAVIAN; 10. ON THE NOTION 'PASSIVE MORPHOLOGY'; 11. CAUSATIVE VERB FORMATION
327   $a12. COMPLEXINTERACTIONSREFERENCES; LANGUAGE INDEX; SUBJECT INDEX
330   $aThis investigation of complex verb formation seeks to identify and clarify the way(s) in which a base verb becomes 'complex'. The author carefully considers both the syntactic and the morphological side of this question, and in doing so brings a wealth of data from very diverse languages to bear on claims made about the relationship between syntactic and morphological structure. The work takes the radical position that most data admit of either a syntactic (Phrase Structure) or lexical analysis because both are likely to be valid - under different circumstances. Both approaches are consistentl
410  0$aAmsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science.$nSeries IV,$pCurrent issues in linguistic theory ;$vv. 95.
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xVerb
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xWord formation
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xVerb.
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xWord formation.
676   $a415
700   $aMiller$b D. Gary$0183216
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910457711303321
996   $aComplex verb formation$91002074
997   $aUNINA