LEADER 04068nam  2200661 a 450 
001 9910457636703321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-283-35915-4
010   $a9786613359155
010   $a90-272-7959-4
035   $a(CKB)2550000000072602
035   $a(EBL)805797
035   $a(OCoLC)301068873
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001004644
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11582233
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001004644
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11047040
035   $a(PQKB)11478823
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC805797
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL805797
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10517164
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000072602
100   $a19860506d1985      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aInternational news reporting$b[electronic resource] $emetapragmatic metaphors and the U-2 /$fJef Verschueren
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins Pub. Co.$d1985
215   $a1 online resource (117 p.)
225 1 $aPragmatics & beyond,$x0166-6258 ;$v6:5
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a90-272-2547-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aINTERNATIONAL NEWS REPORTING: Metapragmatic Metaphors and the U-2; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; PREFACE; 1. THE FREE PRESS AS INEVITABLE TARGET; 1.0. Introduction; 1.1. The event; 1.2. The reporting; 1.3. The uptake; 1.4. Two predictions and a moral; 2. LINGUISTS AND THE MEDIA: ELEMENTS OF A CIRCUS TRIAL; 2.0. Introduction; 2.1. Jalbert, Shaba, Time, and Newsweek; 2.2. Like-minded judges; 2.3 Relevant questions; 3. A CASE STUDY: THE TOPIC; 3.0. Introduction: The U-2 incident; 3.1. Metapragmatic terms; 3.2. Metapragmatic metaphors; 3.3. The topic
327   $a4. A CASE STUDY: DATA AND COMMENTS 4.0. Introduction; 4.1. May 6th; 4.1.1. Article 1 (front page); 4.1.2. Article 2 (front page); 4.1.3. Article 3 (front page); 4.1.4. Article 4; 4.1.5. Article 5; 4.1.6. Further comments; 4.2. May 7th; 4.2.1. Article 6 (front page); 4.2.2. Article 7 (front page); 4.2.3. Article 8 (front page); 4.2.4. Further comments; 4.3. May 8th; 4.3.1. Article 9 (front page); 4.3.2. Article 10 (front page); 4.3.3. Article 11 (front page); 4.3.4. Further comments; 4.4. May 9th; 4.5. May 10th to May 12th; 4.6. May 13th to May 16th; 4.7. May 17th
327   $a4.7.1. Article 17 (front page)4.7.2. Article 18 (front page); 4.7.3. Related articles; 4.7.4. Comments; 4.8. May 18th to May 20th; 5. A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS; 5.0. Introduction; 5.1. News reporting and truth; 5.2. News reporting and interpretation; 5.3. News reporting and understanding; 5.4. Misunderstanding: Whose responsibility?; FOOTNOTES; REFERENCES; INDEX
330   $aWith reference to a brief description of inherent properties of the international news reporting process in a free press tradition, Verschueren criticizes their being neglected in linguistic approaches to the language of the media. In an attempt to illustrate the potential contribution of functional linguistic analyses to a better understanding of the printed media as a channel for international communication, he investigates the use of metapragmatic metaphors (in particular metaphorical verbs of speaking) in the reporting by The New York Times  on the U-2 incident in May 1960. The fram
410  0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$v6:5.
606   $aForeign news$zUnited States
606   $aAmerican newspapers$xLanguage
606   $aU-2 Incident, 1960
606   $aMetaphor
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aForeign news
615  0$aAmerican newspapers$xLanguage.
615  0$aU-2 Incident, 1960.
615  0$aMetaphor.
676   $a071/.471
700   $aVerschueren$b Jef$0158632
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910457636703321
996   $aInternational news reporting$92165000
997   $aUNINA