LEADER 03898nam  22007812  450 
001 9910457573403321
005 20160309155536.0
010   $a1-107-15113-9
010   $a1-280-54091-5
010   $a0-511-21501-0
010   $a0-511-21680-7
010   $a0-511-21143-0
010   $a0-511-31550-3
010   $a0-511-48473-9
010   $a0-511-21320-4
035   $a(CKB)1000000000352887
035   $a(EBL)266659
035   $a(OCoLC)171139055
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000248037
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11208856
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000248037
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10201071
035   $a(PQKB)10604713
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511484735
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC266659
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL266659
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10131630
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL54091
035   $a(OCoLC)144618427
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000352887
100   $a20090226d2004||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aSodomy, masculinity, and law in medieval literature $eFrance and England, 1050-1230 /$fWilliam E. Burgwinkle$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2004.
215   $a1 online resource (xii, 298 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge studies in medieval literature ;$v51
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a0-521-11858-1 
311   $a0-521-83968-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 203-291) and index.
327   $gIntroduction --$gPart. I. Locating sodomy --$tLocating sodomy --$tImagining sodomy --$gPart. II. Confronting sodomy --$tMaking Perceval: double-binding and sie?ges pe?rilleux --$tQueering the Celts: Marie de France and the men who don't marry --$tWriting the self: Alain de Lille's De planctu naturae --$gConclusion.
330   $aWilliam Burgwinkle surveys poetry and letters, histories and literary fiction - including Grail romances - to offer a historical survey of attitudes towards same-sex love during the centuries that gave us the Plantagenet court of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine, courtly love, and Arthurian lore. Burgwinkle illustrates how 'sodomy' becomes a problematic feature of narratives of romance and knighthood. Most texts of the period denounce sodomy and use accusations of sodomitical practice as a way of maintaining a sacrificial climate in which masculine identity is set in opposition to the stigmatised other, for example the foreign, the feminine, and the heretical. What emerges from these readings, however, is that even the most homophobic, masculinist and normative texts of the period demonstrate an inability or unwillingness to separate the sodomitical from the orthodox. These blurred boundaries allow readers to glimpse alternative, even homoerotic, readings.
410  0$aCambridge studies in medieval literature ;$v51.
517 3 $aSodomy, Masculinity & Law in Medieval Literature
606   $aHomosexuality in literature
606   $aSodomy in literature
606   $aMasculinity in literature
606   $aLiterature, Medieval$xHistory and criticism
606   $aHomosexuality$zEurope$xHistory
606   $aSodomy$zEurope$xHistory
615  0$aHomosexuality in literature.
615  0$aSodomy in literature.
615  0$aMasculinity in literature.
615  0$aLiterature, Medieval$xHistory and criticism.
615  0$aHomosexuality$xHistory.
615  0$aSodomy$xHistory.
676   $a820.9384
700   $aBurgwinkle$b William E.$f1951-$0223701
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910457573403321
996   $aSodomy, masculinity, and law in medieval literature$91899053
997   $aUNINA