LEADER 05639nam 2200685 a 450 001 9910457507703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-283-32785-6 010 $a9786613327857 010 $a90-272-7614-5 035 $a(CKB)2550000000061691 035 $a(EBL)799765 035 $a(OCoLC)769341957 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000990702 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11632256 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000990702 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10988781 035 $a(PQKB)10136527 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC799765 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL799765 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10513334 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL332785 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000061691 100 $a19960827d1996 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAnglicisms, neologisms and dynamic French$b[electronic resource] /$fMichael D. Picone 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub. Co.$dc1996 215 $a1 online resource (474 p.) 225 1 $aLingvisticae investigationes. Supplementa,$x0165-7569 ;$vv. 18 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-3127-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aANGLICISMS, NEOLOGISMS AND DYNAMIC FRENCH; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of Contents; Acknowledgments; Chapter 1. Definitions and Issues; 1.1 General Orientation; Defining Anglicisms and Neologisms; 1.2 Delimiting the Field of Investigation; 1.3 Lexical vs. Syntactic Borrowing; 1.4 Defining Derivation and Compounding; 1.5 Innovations in French Lexicogenesis; 1.5.1 Samples; 1.5.2Sources; 1.6 The Analyticity-Syntheticity Axis; 1.6.1 The Controversy; 1.6.2 Analyticity and the Legacy of Borrowing; 1.7 Anglicisms in the Larger Neological Context 327 $a1.8 Accelerating and Revamping Traditional Neology1.9 Normativity and Neology; Chapter 2. Juxtapositional Neology; 2.1 Describing Juxtapositional Neologisms; 2.2 Anglicisms as Constituents in Juxtapositional Neology; 2.2.1 Integral Borrowings, Pseudo-Anglicisms and Hybrids; 2.2.2 Compositional Elements Borrowed from English; 2.2.2.1 baby; 2.2.2.2 big; 2.2.2.3 black; 2.2.2.4 blue; 2.2.2.5 brown, green, pink, red, white; 2.2.2.6 express; 2.2.2.7 fast; 2.2.2.8 first; 2.2.2.9 free; 2.2.2.10 happy; 2.2.2.11 high (hi); 2.2.2.12 hot, cool, cold; 2.2.2.13 new; 2.2.2.14 quick; 2.2.2.15 top 327 $a2.3 Selection Criteria2.3.1 Selection of Borrowed Constituents; 2.3.2 Selection of Structures and Graphological Representations; 2.3.3.1 Selection of Native Constituents together with Innovative Structures and Graphological Representations; 2.3.3.2 rapide; 2.3.3.3 magique; 2.3.3.4 moderne; 2.3.3.5 Other Native Constituents; 2.4 calques; 2.4.1 Structural calques; 2.4.2 Semantic calques; 2.4.3 pre?t-a?-porter; Chapter 3. Binomial Constructions; 3.1 Generalities; 3.2 Apposition; 3.2.1 Accelerated Productivity; 3.2.2 Appositionin Relation to Dvandvas 327 $a3.2.3 Appositional Binomials Viewed as Forming a Superclass Arranged along a Continuum3.2.4 The NAGENT + [V-STEM + NOMINALIZER]N Formula; 3.2.5 Appositional Designations of Gender, Status and Age: Comparing and Contrasting Native Stock and Anglicisms; 3.2.5.1 femme; 3.2.5.2 Miss, Lady; 3.2.5.3 homme; 3.2.5.4 Mister, Lord, King; 3.2.5.5 enfant,fille , garc?on , be?be?; 3.2.5.6 girl, boy, baby; 3.2.6 Figurative Appositions; 3.2.6.1 Parallel Incorporation of Anglicisms and Native Constituents; 3.2.6.2 e?toile/ star; 3.2.6.3 soleil/sun; 3.2.6.4 e?clair/flash; 3.2.6.5 Virtual Co-reference 327 $a3.3 Subordinating Ellipsis3.3.1 Nature and Precedent; 3.3.2 The Link to the Genitive of Juxtaposition; 3.3.3 Anglicisms as Constituents in Genitive Binomials; 3.3.4 Inversion in Genitive Binomials; 3.3.5 Extensions in the Use of Subordinating Ellipsis; 3.3.6 Animate Common Nouns as Genitive Constitue; 3.3.7 English-Origin Constituents Licensing Inversion of Animate Common Nouns in Genitive Constructs; 3.3.8 Pseudo-Anglicisms Incorporating -'s; 3.3.9 Moving Beyond Animateness; 3.3.10 Moving Beyond Genitivity and Tracing the Role ofAppositional Crossover 327 $a3.3.11 Ambivalent Constituents Contributing to Binomial Ellipsis 330 $aThis comprehensive study of Anglicisms in the context of accelerated neological activity in Contemporary Metropolitan French not only provides detailed documentation and description of a fascinating topic, but opens up new vistas on issues of general linguistic interest: the effects of technology on language, the analyticity-syntheticity controversy, the lexical contribution to language vitality, the study of compound word formation, the interplay between cultural and linguistic affectivity. By investigating the dynamics of borrowing within the larger framework of general neological productivi 410 0$aLinguisticae investigationes.$pSupplementa ;$vv. 18. 606 $aFrench language$xForeign words and phrases$xEnglish 606 $aFrench language$xForeign elements$xEnglish 606 $aFrench language$xNew words 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aFrench language$xForeign words and phrases$xEnglish. 615 0$aFrench language$xForeign elements$xEnglish. 615 0$aFrench language$xNew words. 676 $a442/.421 700 $aPicone$b Michael D$0865842 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910457507703321 996 $aAnglicisms, neologisms and dynamic French$91932273 997 $aUNINA