LEADER 03358nam  2200637Ia 450 
001 9910457503203321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-19-991937-2
010   $a1-283-42738-9
010   $a9786613427380
010   $a0-19-979840-0
035   $a(CKB)2550000000079009
035   $a(EBL)845969
035   $a(OCoLC)774276661
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000592981
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12292393
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000592981
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10736704
035   $a(PQKB)11246913
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000054963
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC845969
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL845969
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10524887
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL342738
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000079009
100   $a20110311d2011      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aRetributivism has a past$b[electronic resource] $ehas it a future? /$fedited by Michael Tonry
210   $aOxford ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$dc2011
215   $a1 online resource (304 p.)
225 1 $aStudies in penal theory and philosophy
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-19-979827-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aCover; Contents; Preface; Contributors; 1. Can Twenty-first Century Punishment Policies Be Justified in Principle?; 2. Is Twenty-first Century Punishment Post-desert?; 3. What Does Wrongdoing Deserve?; 4. Responsibility, Restoration, and Retribution; 5. Punishment and Desert-adjusted Utilitarianism; 6. The Future of State Punishment: The Role of Public Opinion in Sentencing; 7. A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection; 8. Terror as a Theory of Punishment; 9. Can Above-desert Penalties Be Justified by Competing Deontological Theories?
327   $a10. Never Mind the Pain, It's a Measure! Justifying Measures as Part of the Dutch Bifurcated System of Sanctions11. Retributivism, Proportionality, and the Challenge of the Drug Court Movement; 12. Drug Treatment Courts as Communicative Punishment; 13. Punishment Futures: The Desert-model Debate and the Importance of the Criminal Law Context; Index;
330   $aFor nearly two centuries in the United States, the punishment of crime was largely aimed, in theory and in practice, at prevention, rehabilitation or incapacitation, and deterrence. In the mid-1970's, a sharp-and some argued permanent-shift occurred. Punishment in the criminal justice system became first and foremost about retribution. Retribution trumped rehabilitation; proportionality outweighed prevention. The retributivist sea change was short-lived, however. After a few decades, some policy makers returned tentatively to individualized approaches to punishment, launching initiatives like...
410  0$aStudies in penal theory and philosophy.
606   $aPunishment$xPhilosophy
606   $aRetribution
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aPunishment$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aRetribution.
676   $a364.601
701   $aTonry$b Michael H$0145323
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910457503203321
996   $aRetributivism has a past$92248345
997   $aUNINA