LEADER 04572nam 22007091c 450 001 9910456749303321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a1-4725-6536-3 010 $a1-283-13053-X 010 $a9786613130532 010 $a1-84731-626-3 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472565365 035 $a(CKB)2550000000039430 035 $a(EBL)714183 035 $a(OCoLC)730151869 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000530072 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11306524 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000530072 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10568757 035 $a(PQKB)11387759 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772669 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC714183 035 $a(OCoLC)742517300 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09256165 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL714183 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000039430 100 $a20140929d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aSetting the watch $eprivacy and the ethics of CCTV surveillance $fBeatrice von Silva-Tarouca Larsen 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford $aPortland, OR $cHart Publishing $d2011. 215 $a1 online resource (227 p.) 225 0 $aStudies in penal theory and penal ethics 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-84946-084-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [187]-196) and index 327 $a1 Privacy Interests in Public Space -- I. The Concept of Privacy -- II. Is There a Claim to Privacy in Public Space? -- III. The Boundaries of Access Control in Public Spaces -- IV. Is There Scope for Anonymity in Late Modern Society? -- V. Moral Concerns Raised by the Restriction of Anonymity and the Justification of Public CCTV Surveillance -- 2 Does Public CCTV Violate Anonymity Interests? -- I. Modalities of Public CCTV Regimes and Their Modus Operandi -- II. Is CCTV Just Another Pair of Eyes? -- 3 Crime Prevention's Possible Legitimising Role -- I. Models for Resolving Conflicts between Privacy Interests and Crime Prevention Objectives -- II. The Value of Anonymity -- III. The Importance of Public CCTV's Crime Prevention Mission -- IV. How Effective is Public CCTV Surveillance for Combating Street Crime? -- 4 Policy Principles and the Regulation of Public CCTV Surveillance -- I. Policy Considerations for Public CCTV Surveillance -- II. The Regulation of Public CCTV Surveillance 330 8 $aMany liberals consider CCTV surveillance in public places - particularly when it is as extensive as it is in England - to be an infringement of important privacy-based rights. An influential report by the House of Lords in 2009 also took this view. However there has been little public, or academic, discussion of the underlying principles and ethical issues. What rights of privacy or anonymity do people have when abroad in public space? What is the rationale for these rights? In what respect does CCTV surveillance compromise them? To what extent does the state's interest in crime prevention warrant encroachment upon such privacy and anonymity rights? This book offers the first extended, systematic treatment of these issues. In it, the author develops a theory concerning the rationale for the entitlement to privacy and anonymity in public space, based on notions of liberty and dignity. She examines how CCTV surveillance may compromise these rights, drawing on everyday conventions of civil inattention among people in the public domain. She also considers whether and to what extent crime-control concerns could justify overriding these entitlements. The author's conclusion is that CCTV surveillance should be appropriate only in certain restrictively-defined situations. The book ends with a proposal for a scheme of CCTV surveillance that reflects this conclusion 410 0$aStudies in penal theory and penal ethics. 606 $aPrivacy, Right of$zEngland 606 $2Criminal justice law 606 $aVideo surveillance$xMoral and ethical aspects 606 $aClosed-circuit television$zEngland 606 $aSocial control$zEngland 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aPrivacy, Right of 615 0$aVideo surveillance$xMoral and ethical aspects. 615 0$aClosed-circuit television 615 0$aSocial control 676 $a342.41/0858 700 $aVon Silva-Tarouca Larsen$b Beatrice$01032759 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910456749303321 996 $aSetting the watch$92450796 997 $aUNINA