LEADER 03935nam  2200697 a 450 
001 9910456673903321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a9786613234162
010   $a90-272-8228-5
010   $a1-283-23416-5
035   $a(CKB)2550000000045476
035   $a(EBL)744221
035   $a(OCoLC)745866926
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001101350
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11729027
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001101350
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11066463
035   $a(PQKB)10038647
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC744221
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL744221
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10492647
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL323416
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000045476
100   $a19980806d1998      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aPolarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency$b[electronic resource] /$fAnastasia Giannakidou
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub. Co.$dc1998
215   $a1 online resource (297 p.)
225 1 $aLinguistik aktuell,$x0166-0829 ;$vv. 23
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a90-272-2744-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [261]-276) and index.
327   $aCONTENTS; Preface; 1 The Semantic Nature of Polarity Sensitivity; 1.1 Previous approaches; 1.2 Polarity sensitivity as semantic dependency; 1.3 Polarity sensitivity in dynamic semantics; 1.4 Conclusion; 2 Varieties of Sensitivity in Greek; 2.1 Sentence structure in Greek; 2.2 The syntactic representation of sentential negation; 2.3 Affective dependencies; 2.4 Free choice items; 2.5 Mood choice in relative clauses; 2. 6 Conclusion: A Typology of Polarity Items in Greek; 3 Polarity Dependencies and (Non)veridicality; 3.1 Mood choice and affective dependencies
327   $a3.2 Determiners, quantifiers and (non) veridicality 3.3 Other licensing environments for affective polarity items; 3.4 Negative polarity; 3.5 Generalizing (non)veridicality: nonaffective dependencies and any; 3.6 Conclusion; 4 The Syntactic Characterization of the Licensing Domain; 4.1 Manifestations of negative concord; 4.2 The NEG-criterion approach; 4.3 The nonquantificational approach: n-words as indefinites; 4.4 N-words as context sensitive expressions; 4.5 Negative concord and quantifier scope; 4.6 Weak negative dependencies; 4.7 The pragmatic import of negative sentences; 4.8 Conclusion
327   $aConclusions Bibliography; Index
330   $aPolarity phenomena have been known to linguists since Klima's seminal work on English negation. In this monograph Giannakidou presents a novel theory of polarity which avoids the empirical and conceptual problems of previous approaches by introducing a notion wider than negation and downward entailment: (non)veridicality. The leading idea is that the various polarity phenomena observed in language are manifestations of the dependency of certain expessions, i.e. polarity items, to the (non)veridicality of the context of appearance. Dependencies to negation or downward entailment emerge as subca
410  0$aLinguistik aktuell ;$vBd. 23.
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax
606   $aSemantics
606   $aDependency grammar
606   $aGreek language, Modern$xSyntax
606   $aGreek language, Modern$xSemantics
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax.
615  0$aSemantics.
615  0$aDependency grammar.
615  0$aGreek language, Modern$xSyntax.
615  0$aGreek language, Modern$xSemantics.
676   $a415
700   $aGiannakidou$b Anastasia$0898409
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910456673903321
996   $aPolarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency$92007271
997   $aUNINA