LEADER 05896nam 2200745Ia 450 001 9910456420103321 005 20210618220700.0 010 $a9786612357169 010 $a0-520-93009-6 010 $a1-282-35716-6 010 $a1-59734-585-7 024 7 $a10.1525/9780520930094 035 $a(CKB)111090529079610 035 $a(EBL)224797 035 $a(OCoLC)475931984 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000142423 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11167047 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000142423 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10111515 035 $a(PQKB)11360124 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC224797 035 $a(OCoLC)55530070 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse30367 035 $a(DE-B1597)518910 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780520930094 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL224797 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10057087 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL235716 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111090529079610 100 $a20030430d2004 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#---|u||u 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 04$aThe early Upper Paleolithic beyond Western Europe$b[electronic resource] /$fedited by P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Steven L. Kuhn, and Kristopher W. Kerry 210 $aBerkeley $cUniversity of California Press$dc2004 215 $a1 online resource (313 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a0-520-23851-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tFIGURES AND TABLES --$tPREFACE --$t1. On the Difficulty of the Middle-Upper Paleolithic Transitions --$t2. Early Upper Paleolithic Backed Blade Industries in Central and Eastern Europe --$t3. Continuities, Discontinuities, and Interactions in Early Upper Paleolithic Technologies: A View from the Middle Danube --$t4. Koulichivka and Its Place in the Middle-Upper Paleolithic Transition in Eastern Europe --$t5. Origins of the European Upper Paleolithic, Seen from Crimea: Simple Myth or Complex Reality? --$t6. The Beginning of the Upper Paleolithic on the Russian Plain --$t7. Emergence of the Levantine Upper Paleolithic: Evidence from the Wadi al-Hasa --$t8. New Perspectives on the Initial Upper Paleolithic: The View from Üça?izh Cave, Turkey --$t9. The Upper Paleolithic in Western Georgia --$t10. The Aurignacian in Asia --$t11. The Middle-Upper Paleolithic Interface in Former Soviet Central Asia --$t12. The Early Upper Paleolithic of Siberia --$t13. Origin of the Upper Paleolithic in Siberia: A Geoarchaeological Perspective --$t14. Initial Upper Paleolithic Blade Industries from the North-Central Gobi Desert, Mongolia --$t15. The Initial Upper Paleolithic at Shuidonggou, Northwestern China --$t16. The Early Upper Paleolithic and the Origins of Modern Human Behavior --$tReferences --$tContributors --$tIndex 330 $aThis volume brings together prominent archaeologists working in areas outside Western Europe to discuss the most recent evidence for the origins of the early Upper Paleolithic and its relationship to the origin of modern humans. With a wealth of primary data from archaeological sites and regions that have never before been published and discussions of materials from difficult-to-find sources, the collection urges readers to reconsider the process of modern human behavioral origins. Archaeological evidence continues to play a critical role in debates over the origins of anatomically modern humans. The appearance of novel Upper Paleolithic technologies, new patterns of land use, expanded social networks, and the emergence of complex forms of symbolic communication point to a behavioral revolution beginning sometime around 45,000 years ago. Until recently, most of the available evidence for this revolution derived from Western European archaeological contexts that suggested an abrupt replacement of Mousterian Middle Paleolithic with Aurignacian Upper Paleolithic adaptations. In the absence of fossil association, the behavioral transition was thought to reflect the biological replacement of archaic hominid populations by intrusive modern humans. The contributors present new archaeological evidence that tells a very different story: The Middle-Upper Paleolithic transitions in areas as diverse as the Levant, Eastern-Central Europe, and Central and Eastern Asia are characterized both by substantial behavioral continuity over the period 45,000-25,000 years ago and by a mosaic-like pattern of shifting adaptations. Together these essays will enliven and enrich the discussion of the shift from archaic to modern behavioral adaptations. Contributors: O. Bar-Yosef, A. Belfer-Cohen, R. L. Bettinger, P. J. Brantingham, N. R. Coinman, A. P. Derevianko, R. G. Elston, J. R. Fox, X. Gao, J. M. Geneste, T. Goebel, E. Güleç, K. W. Kerry, L. Koulakovskaia, J. K. Kozlowski, S. L. Kuhn, Y. V. Kuzmin, D. B. Madsen, A. E. Marks, L. Meignen, T. Meshveliani, K. Monigal, P. E. Nehoroshev, J. W. Olsen, M. Otte, M. C. Stiner,J. Svoboda, A. Sytnik, D. Tseveendorj, L. B. Vishnyatsky 606 $aPaleolithic period$zEurope, Eastern 606 $aPaleolithic period$zAsia, Central 606 $aTools, Prehistoric$zEurope, Eastern 606 $aTools, Prehistoric$zAsia, Central 607 $aEurope, Eastern$xAntiquities 607 $aAsia, Central$xAntiquities 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aPaleolithic period 615 0$aPaleolithic period 615 0$aTools, Prehistoric 615 0$aTools, Prehistoric 676 $a939/.6 701 $aBrantingham$b P. Jeffrey$f1970-$01028256 701 $aKuhn$b Steven L.$f1956-$0487262 701 $aKerry$b Kristopher W.$f1970-$01028257 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910456420103321 996 $aThe early Upper Paleolithic beyond Western Europe$92444201 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04301nam 2200613Ia 450 001 9910462879603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-7983-0345-X 035 $a(CKB)2670000000340357 035 $a(EBL)1164440 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000938522 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11583080 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000938522 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10920051 035 $a(PQKB)11662552 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1164440 035 $a(OCoLC)840839317 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse27019 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1164440 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10677896 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL499257 035 $a(OCoLC)841907745 035 $a(PPN)254806821 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000340357 100 $a20130413d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aCreating systems of innovation in Africa$b[electronic resource] $ecountry case studies /$fedited by Mammon Muchie and Angathevar Baskaran 210 $aOxford $cAfrica Institute of South Africa$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (238 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-7983-0347-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aPreface -- Contributing authors -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Research typology and knowledge needs for development in Africa -- Chapter 2. Ghana's innovation system: what's wrong with it and why -- Chapter 3. Labour productivity, exports and skills formation: comparing foreign and local firms in Kenyan manufacturing -- Chapter 4. Innovative approaches to industrial utilisation of Cassava in a developing economy -- Chapter 5. Enhancing innovation in developing country systems: a synthesis of case studies and lessons from Uganda -- Chapter 6. Innovation financing, industrial production and the growth of Nigeria's non-oil exports -- Chapter 7. A firm-level analysis of technological externality of foreign direct investment in South Africa -- Chapter 8. A consensual approach to domain-partitioning of a cancer data sample space: lessons from Tanzania -- Chapter 9. Remote sensing and geological investigation of Okemesi area, Southerwestern Nigeria -- Chapter 10. Conclusion. 330 $a"The most popularised concept in the economics of innovation literature has been the national system of innovation (NSI). It was in the late 1980's that the concept that Frederik List coined as the 'National Political Economy of Production' took off again with different thinkers writing about the peculiarities and distinctions of the Japanese, American, British, German, East Asian Tigers and other varieties of system construction. Freeman defines National System of Innovation as 'the network of institutions in the public and private sectors whose activities and interactions initiate, import, modify and diff use new technologies.' Richard Nelson defines it as 'a set of institutions whose interactions determine the innovative performance of national firms. Lundvall defines the system of innovation as the 'elements and relationships which interact in the production, diffusion and use of new and economically useful knowledge and are either located within or rooted inside the borders of a nation state.' The normative assumption is that those nations that succeeded in building economic strength relied on the science, engineering, technology and innovation capability that made them to achieve an innovation advantage to put them ahead in the world, acquiring national or regional economic leadership as the case may be depending on what level of analyses is selected to look at particular failure, success or progress they made"--Page 4 of cover. 410 0$aUPCC book collections on Project Muse. 606 $aEconomic development$zAfrica 606 $aDeveloping countries 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aEconomic development 615 0$aDeveloping countries. 676 $a338.064 701 $aBaskaran$b Angathevar$0861348 701 $aMuchie$b Mammo$0861349 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910462879603321 996 $aCreating systems of innovation in Africa$92138473 997 $aUNINA