LEADER 06431nam 22007571c 450 001 9910456264403321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a1-84731-780-4 010 $a1-4725-6089-2 010 $a1-283-16865-0 010 $a9786613168658 010 $a1-84731-630-1 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472560896 035 $a(CKB)2550000000040988 035 $a(EBL)737251 035 $a(OCoLC)742333395 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000530073 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12176298 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000530073 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10561576 035 $a(PQKB)10984213 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772966 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6161327 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC737251 035 $a(OCoLC)1138519869 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09255722 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL737251 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000040988 100 $a20140929d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aMethodologies of legal research $ewhich kind of method for what kind of discipline? $fedited by Mark van Hoecke 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford $aPortland, Oregon $cHart Publishing $d2011. 215 $a1 online resource (310 p.) 225 1 $aEuropean Academy of Legal Theory monograph series 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a1-84946-499-5 311 $a1-84946-170-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index 327 $tLegal doctrine : which method(s) for what kind of discipline? /$rMark van Hoecke --$tThe method of a truly normative legal science /$rJaap Hage --$tExplanatory non-normative legal doctrine : taking the distinction between theoretical and practical reason seriously /$rAnne Ruth Mackor --$tA world without law professors /$rMathias M. Siems --$tOpen or autonomous? : the debate on legal methodology as a reflection of the debate on law /$rPauline C. Westermman --$tMethodology of legal doctrinal research : a comment on Westerman /$rJan Vranken --$tThe epistemological function of "la doctrine" /$rHoratia Muir Watt --$tMaps, methodologies and critiques : confessions of a contract lawyer /$rRoger Brownsword --$tLegal research and the distinctiveness of comparative law /$rJohn Bell --$tDoes one need an understanding of methodology in law before one can understand methodology in comparative law? /$rGeoffrey Samuel --$tComparative law, legal linguistics and methodology of legal doctrine /$rJaakko Husa --$tDoing what doesn't come naturally : on the distinctiveness of comparative law /$rMaurice Adams --$tPromises and pitfalls of interdisciplinary legal research : the case of evolutionary analysis in law /$rBart Du Laing --$tBehavioural economics and legal research /$rJulie De Coninck --$tTheory and objection in law : the case for legal scholarship as indirect speech /$rBert Van Roermund 327 $a1. Legal Doctrine: Which Method(s) for What Kind of Discipline? -- Mark Van Hoecke -- 2. The Method of a Truly Normative Legal Science -- Jaap Hage -- 3. Explanatory Non-Normative Legal Doctrine. Taking the Distinction between Theoretical and Practical Reason Seriously -- Anne Ruth Mackor -- 4. A World without Law Professors -- Mathias M Siems -- 5. Open or Autonomous? The Debate on Legal Methodology as a Reflection of the Debate on Law -- Pauline C Westerman -- 6. Methodology of Legal Doctrinal Research: A Comment on Westerman -- Jan Vranken -- 7. The Epistemological Function of 'la Doctrine' -- Horatia Muir Watt -- 8. Maps, Methodologies and Critiques: Confessions of a Contract Lawyer -- Roger Brownsword -- 9. Legal Research and the Distinctiveness of Comparative Law -- John Bell -- 10. Does One Need an Understanding of Methodology in Law Before One Can Understand Methodology in Comparative Law? -- Geoffrey Samuel -- 11. Comparative Law, Legal Linguistics and Methodology of Legal Doctrine -- Jaakko Husa -- 12. Doing What Doesn't Come Naturally. On the Distinctiveness of Comparative Law -- Maurice Adams -- 13. Promises and Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: The Case of Evolutionary Analysis in Law -- Bart Du Laing -- 14. Behavioural Economics and Legal Research -- Julie De Coninck -- 15. Theory and Object in Law: the Case for Legal Scholarship as Indirect Speech -- Bert Van Roermund 330 8 $aUntil quite recently questions about methodology in legal research have been largely confined to understanding the role of doctrinal research as a scholarly discipline. In turn this has involved asking questions not only about coverage but, fundamentally, questions about the identity of the discipline. Is it (mainly) descriptive, hermeneutical, or normative? Should it also be explanatory? Legal scholarship has been torn between, on the one hand, grasping the expanding reality of law and its context, and, on the other, reducing this complex whole to manageable proportions. The purely internal analysis of a legal system, isolated from any societal context, remains an option, and is still seen in the approach of the French academy, but as law aims at ordering society and influencing human behaviour, this approach is felt by many scholars to be insufficient. Consequently many attempts have been made to conceive legal research differently. Social scientific and comparative approaches have proven fruitful. However, does the introduction of other approaches leave merely a residue of 'legal doctrine', to which pockets of social sciences can be added, or should legal doctrine be merged with the social sciences? What would such a broad interdisciplinary field look like and what would its methods be? This book is an attempt to answer some of these questions 410 0$aEuropean Academy of Legal Theory series. 606 $aJurisprudence$xResearch 606 $2Comparative law 606 $aLaw$xResearch 606 $aLaw$xStudy and teaching$xPhilosophy 606 $aLaw$xStudy and teaching$xMethodology 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aJurisprudence$xResearch. 615 0$aLaw$xResearch. 615 0$aLaw$xStudy and teaching$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aLaw$xStudy and teaching$xMethodology. 676 $a340.072 702 $aHoecke$b Mark van 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910456264403321 996 $aMethodologies of legal research$92468135 997 $aUNINA