LEADER 01280nam--2200397---450- 001 990001556750203316 005 20050202112643.0 035 $a000155675 035 $aUSA01000155675 035 $a(ALEPH)000155675USA01 035 $a000155675 100 $a20040402d1985----km-y0itay0103----ba 105 $aa|||||||001yy 200 1 $aFalso Movimento$e77-82 210 $aSalerno$cTaide$d1985 215 $a107 p.$cill. in parte color.$d24 cm 225 2 $aMateriali minimi 300 $aContiene anche: La scacchiera del tempo di Rino Mele e Materiali del teatro di Mario Martone e del gruppo Falso Movimento dai primi lavori a "Tango Glaciale" 410 0$12001$aMateriali minimi 454 1$12001 461 1$1001-------$12001 606 0 $aFalso movimento$z1977-1982 606 0 $aTeatro$xAnalisi strutturale$xSaggi 676 $a792 702 1$aMELE,$bRino 702 1$aMARTONE,$bMario 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990001556750203316 951 $aXIII.1.B. 78 (Varie coll 559/2)$b13145 L.M.$cVarie coll 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 979 $aSIAV6$b10$c20040402$lUSA01$h1708 979 $aSIAV1$b10$c20040406$lUSA01$h1751 979 $aCOPAT4$b90$c20050202$lUSA01$h1126 996 $aFalso Movimento$9941283 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04962nam 2200661Ia 450 001 9910455616403321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-53784-9 010 $a9786612537844 010 $a0-226-78016-3 024 7 $a10.7208/9780226780160 035 $a(CKB)2520000000006490 035 $a(EBL)496603 035 $a(OCoLC)593359766 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000341998 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11947735 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000341998 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10285602 035 $a(PQKB)10095013 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000122535 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC496603 035 $a(DE-B1597)524650 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780226780160 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL496603 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10372058 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL253784 035 $a(EXLCZ)992520000000006490 100 $a20020124d2002 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aPunitive damages$b[electronic resource] $ehow juries decide /$fCass R. Sunstein, W. Kip Viscusi ... [et al.]; with an introduction by George L. Priest 210 $aChicago $cUniversity of Chicago Press$d2002 215 $a1 online resource (299 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-226-78015-5 311 $a0-226-78014-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPreface and Acknowledgments -- $tIntroduction: The Problem and Efforts to Understand It -- $t1. Overview: What We Did and What We Found -- $tIntroduction -- $t2. Shared Outrage, Erratic Awards -- $t3. Deliberating about Dollars: The Severity Shift -- $t4. Do Plaintiffs' Requests and Plaintiffs' Identities Matter? -- $tIntroduction -- $t5. Judging Corporate Recklessness -- $t6 Looking Backward in Punitive Judgments: 20-20 Vision? -- $tIntroduction -- $t7. Corporate Risk Analysis: A Reckless Act? -- $t8. Do People Want Optimal Deterrence? -- $t9. Deterrence Instructions: What Jurors Won't Do -- $t10. Judging Risk and Recklessness -- $t12. Putting It All Together -- $t13. What Should Be Done? -- $tAppendix: Judge's Instructions -- $tGlossary -- $tBibliography -- $tContributors -- $tIndex 330 $aOver the past two decades, the United States has seen a dramatic increase in the number and magnitude of punitive damages verdicts rendered by juries in civil trials. Probably the most extraordinary example is the July 2000 award of $144.8 billion in the Florida class action lawsuit brought against cigarette manufacturers. Or consider two recent verdicts against the auto manufacturer BMW in Alabama. In identical cases, argued in the same court before the same judge, one jury awarded $4million in punitive damages, while the other awarded no punitive damages at all. In cases involving accidents, civil rights, and the environment, multimillion-dollar punitive awards have been a subject of intense controversy. But how do juries actually make decisions about punitive damages? To find out, the authors-experts in psychology, economics, and the law-present the results of controlled experiments with more than 600 mock juries involving the responses of more than 8,000 jury-eligible citizens. Although juries tended to agree in their moral judgments about the defendant's conduct, they rendered erratic and unpredictable dollar awards. The experiments also showed that instead of moderating juror verdicts, the process of jury deliberation produced a striking "severity shift" toward ever-higher awards. Jurors also tended to ignore instructions from the judges; were influenced by whatever amount the plaintiff happened to request; showed "hindsight bias," believing that what happened should have been foreseen; and penalized corporations that had based their decisions on careful cost-benefit analyses. While judges made many of the same errors, they performed better in some areas, suggesting that judges (or other specialists) may be better equipped than juries to decide punitive damages. Using a wealth of new experimental data, and offering a host of provocative findings, this book documents a wide range of systematic biases in jury behavior. It will be indispensable for anyone interested not only in punitive damages, but also jury behavior, psychology, and how people think about punishment. 606 $aExemplary damages$zUnited States 606 $aJury$zUnited States$xDecision making 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aExemplary damages 615 0$aJury$xDecision making. 676 $a347.73 700 $aSunstein$b Cass R., $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0145553 701 $aSunstein$b Cass R 701 $aViscusi$b W. Kip$089612 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910455616403321 996 $aPunitive damages$92036807 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03778 am 2200661 n 450 001 9910166658103321 005 20140101 010 $a2-37154-072-2 024 7 $a10.4000/books.iheal.2499 035 $a(CKB)3710000001092051 035 $a(FrMaCLE)OB-iheal-2499 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/44703 035 $a(PPN)202673340 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001092051 100 $a20170306j|||||||| ||| 0 101 0 $afre 135 $auu||||||m|||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDémocratie et sexualité $ePolitisation de la pilule du lendemain dans le Chili de la Concertación (1990-2010) /$fLila Le Trividi Harrache 210 $aParis $cÉditions de l?IHEAL$d2014 215 $a1 online resource (230 p.) 311 $a2-915310-72-6 330 $aInterroger les liens entre démocratie et sexualité, c?est ce que nous propose Lila Le Trividic Harrache, doctorante en sciences politiques, au cours d?une enquête menée au Chili en 2010. À travers cet ouvrage, l?auteur nous entraîne dans son analyse minutieuse et documentée de l?irruption de la pilule du lendemain dans le débat et les politiques publiques. Elle nous invite ainsi à visiter avec elle le fragile équilibre d?un pays avant-gardiste qui autorisait l?avortement thérapeutique dès 1931, et intégrait même la pilule contraceptive dans une politique plus générale de santé publique de régulation de la fécondité en 1965. Ce même pays qui a contrario quarante-cinq plus tard va jusqu?à interdire tout avortement au motif d?une impossibilité de statuer sur le caractère abortif ou non de cette pilule. Qu?a-t-il bien pu se passer entre la chute de la dictature de Pinochet en 1990 suivie de l?élection du premier président de la Concertación de partidos para la democracia, et la fin du mandat du quatrième président de cette coalition de centre-gauche qui perd les élections présidentielles au profit de la coalition de droite en 2010 ? Est-ce que le régime politique largement hérité de la dictature conservatrice et répressive faisait alors encore le jeu politique dix-sept ans après sa chute ? Le ferait-il au point d?empêcher toute mise en cause des questions liées aux m?urs afin d?éviter tout conflit susceptible de le déchirer à nouveau ? Grâce à Lila Le Trividic Harrache qui est allée six mois au Chili interroger les différents acteurs impliqués, les éléments se mettent progressivement en place jusqu?à former une image nette du lien entre action publique et dictature. 606 $aPolitical Science Public Admin. & Development 606 $aSociology 606 $acontraceptifs postcoïtaux 606 $asanté publique 606 $aChili 606 $apolitique sanitaire 606 $apilule du lendemain 606 $aconflit 606 $afemmes 610 $aChili 610 $apolitique sanitaire 610 $aconflit 610 $acontraceptifs postcoïtaux 610 $apilule du lendemain 610 $afemmes 610 $asanté publique 615 4$aPolitical Science Public Admin. & Development 615 4$aSociology 615 4$acontraceptifs postcoïtaux 615 4$asanté publique 615 4$aChili 615 4$apolitique sanitaire 615 4$apilule du lendemain 615 4$aconflit 615 4$afemmes 700 $aLe Trividi Harrache$b Lila$01325668 701 $aCosío-Zavala$b María Eugenia$01325669 701 $aFregosi$b Renée$01325670 801 0$bFR-FrMaCLE 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910166658103321 996 $aDémocratie et sexualité$93037017 997 $aUNINA