LEADER 03837nam  2200661Ia 450 
001 9910455599003321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-470-79068-7
010   $a1-280-28536-2
010   $a9786610285365
010   $a1-4443-4168-5
010   $a0-585-49512-2
035   $a(CKB)111087027761620
035   $a(EBL)214193
035   $a(OCoLC)475920257
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000219349
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11187117
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000219349
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10228764
035   $a(PQKB)11519182
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC214193
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4661932
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL214193
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10049705
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL28536
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111087027761620
100   $a20040105d2003      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aPeer review in health sciences$b[electronic resource] /$fedited by Fiona Godlee, Tom Jefferson
205   $a2nd ed.
210   $aLondon $cBMJ Books$d2003
215   $a1 online resource (383 p.)
300   $aPrevious ed.: 1999.
311   $a0-7279-1685-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aPeer Review in Health Sciences; Contents; Contributors; Preface; Introduction; 1: Editorial peer review: its development and rationale; 2: Peer review of grant applications: a systematic review; 3: The state of evidence: what we know and what we don't know about journal peer review; 4: The effectiveness of journal peer review; 5: Innovation and peer review; 6: Bias, subjectivity, chance, and conflict of interest in editorial decisions; 7: Misconduct and journal peer review; 8: Peer review and the pharmaceutical industry; 9: Small journals and non-English language journals
327   $a10: How to set up a peer review system11: The evaluation and training of peer reviewers; 12: How to peer review a manuscript; 13: Statistical peer review; 14: Peer review of economic submissions; 15: How to peer review a qualitative manuscript; 16: Ethical conduct for reviewers of grant applications and manuscripts; 17: Non-peer review: consumer involvement in research review; 18: An author's guide to editorial peer review; 19: Peer review on the internet: are there faster, fairer, more effective methods of peer review?
327   $a20: The use of systematic reviews for editorial peer reviewing: a population approach21: Alternatives to peer review I: peer and non-peer review; 22: Alternatives to peer review II: can peer review be better focused?; 23: Peer review: some questions from Socrates; 24: The future of peer review; Appendix A: the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (the Vancouver Group); Appendix B: the World Association of Medical Editors; Appendix C: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE); Index
330   $aThis book has established itself as the authoritative text on health sciences peer review. Contributions from the world's leading figures discuss the state of peer review, question its role in the currently changing world of electronic journal publishing, and debate where it should go from here. The second edition has been thoroughly revised and new chapters added on qualitative peer review, training, consumers and innovation.
606   $aPeer review
606   $aMedicine$xResearch$xEvaluation
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aPeer review.
615  0$aMedicine$xResearch$xEvaluation.
676   $a610.72
701   $aGodlee$b Fiona$0731063
701   $aJefferson$b Tom$0101068
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910455599003321
996   $aPeer review in health sciences$92079202
997   $aUNINA