LEADER 03370nam 2200673 a 450 001 9910455580703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9786612537936 010 $a0-226-30513-9 010 $a1-282-53793-8 024 7 $a10.7208/9780226305134 035 $a(CKB)2520000000006458 035 $a(EBL)496617 035 $a(OCoLC)593295916 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000343130 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11258936 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000343130 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10289222 035 $a(PQKB)11764766 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000122699 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC496617 035 $a(DE-B1597)523717 035 $a(OCoLC)1135583372 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780226305134 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL496617 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10372063 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL253793 035 $a(EXLCZ)992520000000006458 100 $a20041101d2005 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aSpeak no evil$b[electronic resource] $ethe triumph of hate speech regulation /$fJon B. Gould 210 $aChicago $cUniversity of Chicago Press$dc2005 215 $a1 online resource (255 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-226-30553-8 311 $a0-226-30554-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 203-234) and index. 327 $aBackground and chronology -- Theoretical implications -- The rise of hate speech codes -- The courts act -- While they slept -- The triumph of hate speech regulation. 330 $aOpponents of speech codes often argue that liberal academics use the codes to advance an agenda of political correctness. But Jon B. Gould's provocative book, based on an enormous amount of empirical evidence, reveals that the real reasons for their growth are to be found in the pragmatic, almost utilitarian, considerations of college administrators. Instituting hate speech policy, he shows, was often a symbolic response taken by university leaders to reassure campus constituencies of their commitment against intolerance. In an academic version of "keeping up with the Joneses," some schools created hate speech codes to remain within what they saw as the mainstream of higher education. Only a relatively small number of colleges crafted codes out of deep commitment to their merits. Although college speech codes have been overturned by the courts, Speak No Evil argues that their rise has still had a profound influence on curtailing speech in other institutions such as the media and has also shaped mass opinion and common understandings of constitutional norms. Ultimately, Gould contends, this kind of informal law can have just as much power as the Constitution. 606 $aHate speech$zUnited States$xHistory 606 $aRace discrimination$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 606 $aFreedom of speech$zUnited States 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aHate speech$xHistory. 615 0$aRace discrimination$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aFreedom of speech 676 $a345.73/0256 700 $aGould$b Jon B$0890538 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910455580703321 996 $aSpeak no evil$91989276 997 $aUNINA