LEADER 02648oam 2200601I 450 001 9910455549203321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-135-22976-7 010 $a1-282-44417-4 010 $a9786612444173 010 $a0-203-09263-5 024 7 $a10.4324/9780203092637 035 $a(CKB)1000000000811376 035 $a(EBL)455480 035 $a(OCoLC)609844540 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC455480 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL455480 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10358650 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL244417 035 $a(OCoLC)742296894 035 $a(OCoLC)893194508 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000811376 100 $a20180706d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 200 10$aBad news /$fGlasgow University Media Group 210 1$aAbingdon, Oxon :$cRoutledge,$d2010. 215 $a1 online resource (331 p.) 225 1 $aRoutledge revivals 300 $aFirst published in 1976 by Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. 300 $aVol. 2 has title: More bad news. 311 $a0-415-56787-4 311 $a0-415-56376-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aBOOK COVER; TITLE_01; COPYRIGHT_01; COPYRIGHT_02; TITLE_02; COPYRIGHT_03; CONTENTS; FOREWORD; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; 1 REVIEWING THE NEWS; 2 CONSTRUCTING THE PROJECT; 3 INSIDE THE TELEVISION NEWSROOM; 4 MEASURE FOR EASURE; 5 CONTOURS OF COVERAGE; 6 TRADES UINIONS AND THE MEDIA; 7 DOWN TO CASES; APPENDIX 1; APPENDIX 2; NOTES; INDEX 330 $aIt is a commonly held belief that television news in Britain, on whatever channel, is more objective, more trustworthy, more neutral than press reporting. The illusion is exploded in this controversial study by the Glasgow University Media Group, originally published in 1976.The authors undertook an exhaustive monitoring of all television broadcasts over 6 months, from January to June 1975, with particular focus upon industrial news broadcasts, the TUC, strikes and industrial action, business and economic affairs.Their analysis showed how television news favours certain indivi 410 0$aRoutledge revivals. 606 $aTelevision broadcasting of news$zGreat Britain 606 $aBroadcast journalism$zGreat Britain 606 $aJournalism$xObjectivity 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aTelevision broadcasting of news 615 0$aBroadcast journalism 615 0$aJournalism$xObjectivity. 676 $a070.19 676 $a384.554 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910455549203321 996 $aBad News$91741290 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02868nam 2200565 450 001 9910798390703321 005 20211015104618.0 010 $a1-84545-029-9 010 $a1-84545-008-6 010 $a1-78238-962-8 024 7 $a10.1515/9781782389620 035 $a(CKB)3710000000641323 035 $a(EBL)4501282 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4501282 035 $a(DE-B1597)636063 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781782389620 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000641323 100 $a20160426h20062006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aCritical junctions $eanthropology and history beyond the cultural turn /$fedited by Don Kalb and Herman Tak 205 $aFirst paperback edition. 210 1$aNew York, [New York] ;$aOxford, [England] :$cBerghahn Books,$d2006. 210 4$dİ2006 215 $a1 online resource (194 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $aCritical Junctions; Contents; Preface; Introduction; Chapter One. Microhistorical Anthropology; Chapter Two. The Past in the Present; Chapter Three. Figurations in Historical Anthropology; Chapter Four. Beyond the Limits of the Visible World; Chapter Five. "Bare Legs Like Ice"; Chapter Six. Prefiguring NAFTA; Chapter Seven. Historical Anthropology through Local-Level Research; Chapter Eight. Anthropology and History; Contributors; Index 330 $aThe ?cultural turn? has been a multifarious and pervasive phenomenon in Western universities and modes of social knowledge since the early 1980s. This volume focuses on the conjunction of two disciplines where both the analytic promises as well as the difficulties involved in the meeting of humanist and social science approaches soon became obvious. Anthropologists and historians have come together here in order to recapture, elaborate, and criticize pre-Cultural Turn and non-Cultural Turn modes of analysing structures of experience, feeling, subjectivity and action in human societies and to highlight the still unexploited possibilities developed among others in the work of scholars such as Norbert Elias, Max Gluckman, Eric Wolf, E.P. Thompson and Raymond Williams. 606 $aEthnohistory 606 $aAnthropology$xMethodology 606 $aHistoriography 615 0$aEthnohistory. 615 0$aAnthropology$xMethodology. 615 0$aHistoriography. 676 $a303.4 686 $a73.02$2bcl 686 $a15.01$2bcl 702 $aKalb$b Don$f1959- 702 $aTak$b Herman 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910798390703321 996 $aCritical junctions$93710772 997 $aUNINA