LEADER 03938nam 2200673Ia 450 001 9910455384403321 005 20210630191722.0 010 $a1-282-18777-5 010 $a9786612187773 010 $a3-11-021326-5 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110213263 035 $a(CKB)1000000000788233 035 $a(EBL)453927 035 $a(OCoLC)436454523 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000391614 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11283786 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000391614 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10346666 035 $a(PQKB)10905838 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC453927 035 $a(DE-B1597)35847 035 $a(OCoLC)900780449 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110213263 035 $a(PPN)151808341 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL453927 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10314575 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL218777 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000788233 100 $a20090206d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||#|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe invectives of Sallust and Cicero$b[electronic resource] $ecritical edition with introduction, translation, and commentary /$fAnna A. Novokhatko 210 $aBerlin ;$aNew York $cWalter de Gruyter$dc2009 215 $a1 online resource (233 p.) 225 0 $aSozomena. Studies in the recovery of ancient texts ;$vv. 6 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-11-021325-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter --$tContents --$tAbbreviations --$tIntroduction --$tChapter 1. What are the invectives against Cicero and against Sallust? --$tChapter 2. The history of the text know nas Sallust's invectives based on collated medieval manuscripts (10th - early 14th centuries) --$tChapter 3. The problem of authorship and the history of edited invectives (incunabula and 16th-20th centuries) --$tChapter 4. Text known as Sallust's invectives with a new apparatus criticus, a translation, and a commentary --$tBackmatter 330 $aThis work covers the history of the text of the invectives of Sallust against Cicero and of Cicero against Sallust. Though these speeches seem unsophisticated to some, they are in fact of considerable importance. The question of the authenticity of both invectives, especially of the invective against Cicero, considered in the book diachronically, has long troubled scholars, commencing with Quintilian's "ation from the text as though it were authentic. This dispute continues down to our own time. In all probability, both invectives are a product of the rhetorical schools of Rome, as students at such schools might have been set the task of writing a speech against Cicero imitating Sallust, or of responding to Sallust in the style of Cicero. Thus, we possess a sample of rhetorical school exercises, preserved due to their similarities to the prototypes on which they were modelled. The work covers: the full manuscript tradition of the text and also the history of the changes which arose during its transmission, the history of the printed text and the text itself with an apparatus criticus and also a translation. This work should be of interest to classicists, philologists interested in the history of medieval and renaissance texts, and also to those erudite readers concerned with rhetorical style and the functioning of the rhetorical schools of Rome. 410 0$aSozomena 606 $aInvective 607 $aRome$xHistory$yConspiracy of Catiline, 65-62 B.C 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aInvective. 676 $a937/.05 686 $aFX 156300$2rvk 700 $aNovokhatko$b Anna, $01045244 701 $aNovokhatko$b Anna A.$f1978-$01045245 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910455384403321 996 $aThe invectives of Sallust and Cicero$92471352 997 $aUNINA