LEADER 03837nam 22007574a 450 001 9910455331603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-42677-X 010 $a9786612426773 010 $a0-226-64465-0 024 7 $a10.7208/9780226644653 035 $a(CKB)1000000000799970 035 $a(EBL)471812 035 $a(OCoLC)489202765 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000340386 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11252236 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000340386 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10365368 035 $a(PQKB)10468640 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000777593 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12369968 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000777593 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10757472 035 $a(PQKB)11679580 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000122534 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC471812 035 $a(DE-B1597)523808 035 $a(OCoLC)1135589846 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780226644653 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL471812 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10343442 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL242677 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000799970 100 $a20061027d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe Microsoft case$b[electronic resource] $eantitrust, high technology, and consumer welfare /$fWilliam H. Page and John E. Lopatka 210 $aChicago $cUniversity of Chicago Press$d2007 215 $a1 online resource (363 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-226-64464-2 311 $a0-226-64463-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [249]-329) and index. 327 $aOrigins -- Ideological sources of antimonopolization law -- Microsoft's predecessors : the public monopolization case -- Microsoft's beginnings : a post-Chicago convergence -- Decisions -- Chronology -- The liability decisions -- The remedial decisions -- The follow-on private litigation -- The European Commission decision -- Markets -- Two systems of belief about operating systems and middleware -- Network effects and related economic concepts -- Defining software markets -- Practices I : integration -- A preliminary skirmish -- Integration on trial -- Rethinking and redefining integration under Sherman Act standards -- Practices II : the market division proposal, exclusive contracts, and Java -- The market division proposal -- The exclusive contracts -- Java -- Remedies -- The goals of antitrust remedies -- Structural remedies -- Conduct remedies -- Damage remedies. 330 $aIn 1998, the United States Department of Justice and state antitrust agencies charged that Microsoft was monopolizing the market for personal computer operating systems. More than ten years later, the case is still the defining antitrust litigation of our era. William H. Page and John E. Lopatka's The Microsoft Case contributes to the debate over the future of antitrust policy by examining the implications of the litigation from the perspective of consumer welfare. The authors trace the development of the case from its conceptual origins through the tria 606 $aAntitrust law$zUnited States 606 $aRestraint of trade$zUnited States 606 $aComputer software industry$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$vTrials, litigation, etc 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aAntitrust law 615 0$aRestraint of trade 615 0$aComputer software industry$xLaw and legislation 676 $a345.73/0268 700 $aPage$b William H$g(William Hepburn),$f1951-$0901401 701 $aLopatka$b John E$0901402 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910455331603321 996 $aThe Microsoft case$92014801 997 $aUNINA