LEADER 03708nam  22007452  450 
001 9910455105403321
005 20151005020623.0
010   $a1-107-11533-7
010   $a0-511-00554-7
010   $a1-280-15349-0
010   $a0-511-11700-0
010   $a0-511-14959-X
010   $a0-511-30974-0
010   $a0-511-48431-3
010   $a0-511-05084-4
035   $a(CKB)111004366730630
035   $a(EBL)142391
035   $a(OCoLC)475870184
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000239447
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11205807
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000239447
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10239320
035   $a(PQKB)10556908
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511484315
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC142391
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL142391
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10065243
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL15349
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111004366730630
100   $a20090224d1999||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aRomanticism, aesthetics, and nationalism /$fDavid Aram Kaiser$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d1999.
215   $a1 online resource (xiii, 154 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge studies in Romanticism ;$v34
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a0-521-02268-1 
311   $a0-521-63000-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 137-151) and index.
327   $aModernity, subjectivity, liberalism, and nationalism -- The symbol and the aesthetic sphere -- Schiller's aesthetic state -- Symbol, state, and Clerisy: the aesthetic politics of Coleridge -- The best self and the private self: Matthew Arnold on culture and the state -- Aesthetic kingship and queenship: Ruskin on the state and the home -- The aesthetic and political spheres in contemporary theory: Adorno and Habermas.
330   $aThis ambitious study, first published in 1999, argues that our conception of the aesthetic sphere emerged during the era of British and German Romanticism from conflicts between competing models of the liberal state and the cultural nation. The aesthetic sphere is thus centrally connected to 'aesthetic statism', which is the theoretical project of reconciling conflicts in the political sphere by appealing to the unity of the symbol. David Kaiser traces the trajectory of aesthetic statism from Schiller and Coleridge, through Arnold, Mill and Ruskin, to Adorno and Habermas. He analyses how the concept of aesthetic autonomy shifts from being a supplement to the political sphere to an end in itself; this shift lies behind the problems that contemporary literary theory has faced in its attempts to connect the aesthetic and political spheres. Finally, he suggests that we rethink the aesthetic sphere in order to regain that connection.
410  0$aCambridge studies in Romanticism ;$v34.
517 3 $aRomanticism, Aesthetics, & Nationalism
606   $aLiterature$xHistory and criticism
606   $aAesthetics, Modern
606   $aRomanticism
606   $aNationalism in literature
606   $aPolitics and literature
615  0$aLiterature$xHistory and criticism.
615  0$aAesthetics, Modern.
615  0$aRomanticism.
615  0$aNationalism in literature.
615  0$aPolitics and literature.
676   $a801/.93
700   $aKaiser$b David Aram$01039065
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910455105403321
996   $aRomanticism, aesthetics, and nationalism$92461031
997   $aUNINA