LEADER 03089nam 22006371 450 001 9910455034803321 005 20200514202323.0 010 $a1-4725-4570-2 010 $a1-282-29701-5 010 $a9786612297014 010 $a1-4411-5842-1 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472545701 035 $a(CKB)1000000000794338 035 $a(EBL)454776 035 $a(OCoLC)457729353 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000186882 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12020822 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000186882 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10252895 035 $a(PQKB)10347194 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC454776 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL454776 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10329964 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL229701 035 $a(OCoLC)893334699 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09255610 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000794338 100 $a20140929d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aKant's aesthetic theory $ethe beautiful and agreeable /$fDavid Berger 210 1$aLondon ;$aNew York :$cContinuum,$d2009. 215 $a1 online resource (175 p.) 225 1 $aContinuum studies in philosophy 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4411-2497-7 311 $a0-8264-3580-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aThe twofold conception of taste -- The beautiful and the agreeable -- Sensations and interests -- Some varieties of normativity. 330 8 $aTaste is ordinarily thought of in terms of two very different idioms - a normative idiom of taste as a standard of appraisal and a non-normative idiom of taste as a purely personal matter. Kant attempts to capture this twofold conception of taste within the terms of his mature critical philosophy by distinguishing between the beautiful and the agreeable. Scholars have largely taken Kant's distinction for granted, but David Berger argues that it is both far richer and far more problematic than it may appear. Berger examines in detail Kant's various attempts to distinguish beauty from agreeableness. This approach reveals the complex interplay between Kant's substantive aesthetic theory and his broader views on metaphysics and epistemology. Indeed, Berger argues that the real interest of Kant's distinction between beauty and agreeableness is ultimately epistemological. His interpretation brings Kant's aesthetic theory into dialogue with questions at the heart of contemporary analytic philosophy and shows how philosophical aesthetics can offer fresh insights into contemporary philosophical debates 410 0$aContinuum studies in philosophy. 606 $aAesthetics, Modern$y18th century 606 $2History of Western philosophy 615 0$aAesthetics, Modern 676 $a111/.85092 700 $aBerger$b David$f1974-$0962387 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910455034803321 996 $aKant's aesthetic theory$92182147 997 $aUNINA