LEADER 03830nam  22006852  450 
001 9910454951703321
005 20151005020620.0
010   $a1-107-11768-2
010   $a0-511-01190-3
010   $a1-280-42073-1
010   $a0-511-17290-7
010   $a0-511-15180-2
010   $a0-511-32486-3
010   $a0-511-49443-2
010   $a0-511-04841-6
035   $a(CKB)111056485650408
035   $a(EBL)144711
035   $a(OCoLC)437072977
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000181470
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11181889
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000181470
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10166319
035   $a(PQKB)10221717
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511494437
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC144711
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL144711
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr2000926
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL42073
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111056485650408
100   $a20090304d2000||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aInternational organizations before national courts /$fAugust Reinisch$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2000.
215   $a1 online resource (lxviii, 449 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ;$v10
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a0-521-06364-7 
311   $a0-521-65326-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 394-443) and index.
327   $a1. Purpose, subject and methodology of this study -- Pt. I. Descriptive Analysis -- 2. Avoidance techniques -- 3. Strategies of judicial involvement -- Pt. II. Policy Issues -- 4. Rationales for judicial abstention -- 5. Reasons for asserting jurisdiction -- Pt. III. Future Developments -- 6. Do national courts provide an appropriate forum for disputes involving international organizations? -- 7. Conclusions.
330   $aA radical, empirical investigation of how national courts 'react' to disputes involving international organizations. Through comprehensive analysis of the attitudes and techniques of national courts and underlying political motives, Professor Reinisch first describes various legal approaches that result in adjudication or non-adjudication of disputes concerning international organizations. Secondly he discusses policy issues pro and contra the adjudication of such disputes. His study then scrutinizes the rationale for immunizing international organizations from domestic litigations, especially the 'functional' need for immunity, and substantially debates the implications of a human rights-based right of access to court on immunizing international organizations against national jurisdictions. Finally he identifies contemporary trends, seeking to ascertain whether a more flexible principle exempting certain types of disputes from domestic adjudication might substitute for the traditional immunity concept, which would simultaneously guarantee the functioning and independence of international organizations without impairing private parties' access to a fair dispute settlement procedure.
410  0$aCambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ;$v10.
606   $aInternational agencies
606   $aInternational and municipal law
606   $aJurisdiction
615  0$aInternational agencies.
615  0$aInternational and municipal law.
615  0$aJurisdiction.
676   $a341.5/5
700   $aReinisch$b August$0497481
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910454951703321
996   $aInternational organizations before National Courts$9753479
997   $aUNINA