LEADER 06672nam 2200589Ia 450 001 9910454838003321 005 20210810223105.0 010 $a0-674-02015-4 024 7 $a10.4159/9780674020153 035 $a(CKB)1000000000786745 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000243986 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11193944 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000243986 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10164739 035 $a(PQKB)11629631 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3300354 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3300354 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10318344 035 $a(OCoLC)923110790 035 $a(DE-B1597)574652 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780674020153 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000786745 100 $a20010927d2002 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aSemblances of sovereignty$b[electronic resource] $ethe Constitution, the state, and American citizenship /$fT. Alexander Aleinikoff 210 $aCambridge, MA $cHarvard University Press$d2002 215 $axi, 306 p 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-674-00745-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 199-301) and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tPreface -- $tContents -- $tSEMBLANCES OF SOVEREIGNTY -- $t1 Introduction -- $t2 The Sovereignty Cases and the Pursuit of an American Nation-State -- $t3 The Citizen-State: From the Warren Court to the Rehnquist Court -- $t4 Commonwealth and the Constitution: The Case of Puerto Rico -- $t5 The Erosion of American Indian Sovereignty -- $t6 Indian Tribal Sovereignty beyond Plenary Power -- $t7 Plenary Power, Immigration Regulation, and Decentered Citizenship -- $t8 Reconceptualizing Sovereignty: Toward a New American Narrative -- $tNotes -- $tIndex 330 $aIn a set of cases decided at the end of the nineteenth century, the Supreme Court declared that Congress had "plenary power" to regulate immigration, Indian tribes, and newly acquired territories. Not coincidentally, the groups subject to Congress' plenary power were primarily nonwhite and generally perceived as "uncivilized." The Court left Congress free to craft policies of assimilation, exclusion, paternalism, and domination. Despite dramatic shifts in constitutional law in the twentieth century, the plenary power case decisions remain largely the controlling law. The Warren Court, widely recognized for its dedication to individual rights, focused on ensuring "full and equal citizenship"--an agenda that utterly neglected immigrants, tribes, and residents of the territories. The Rehnquist Court has appropriated the Warren Court's rhetoric of citizenship, but has used it to strike down policies that support diversity and the sovereignty of Indian tribes. Attuned to the demands of a new century, the author argues for abandonment of the plenary power cases, and for more flexible conceptions of sovereignty and citizenship. The federal government ought to negotiate compacts with Indian tribes and the territories that affirm more durable forms of self-government. Citizenship should be "decentered," understood as a commitment to an intergenerational national project, not a basis for denying rights to immigrants.Table of Contents: 1. Introduction 2. The Sovereignty Cases and the Pursuit of an American Nation-State 3. The Citizen-State: From the Warren Court to the Rehnqnist Court 4. Commonwealth and the Constitution: The Case of Puerto Rico 5. The Erosion of American Indian Sovereignty 6. Indian Tribal Sovereignty beyond Plenary Power 7. Plenary Power, Immigration Regulation, and Decentered Citizenship 8. Reconceptualizing Sovereignty: Toward a New American Narrative Notes Index Reviews of this book: This book not only provides careful analysis of U.S. Supreme Court and congressional relationships but also could lead to novel studies of rights and obligations in American society. Highly recommended.--Steven Puro, Library JournalReviews of this book: Aleinikoff examines sovereignty, citizenship, and the broader concept of membership (aliens as well as citizens) in the American nation-state and suggests that American constitutional law needs "understandings of sovereignty and membership that are supple and flexible, open to new arrangements".Sure to generate heated debate over the extent to which the rules governing immigration, Indian tribes, and American territories should be altered, this book is required reading for constitutional scholars.--R. J. Steamer, ChoiceAmid the overflowing scholarship on American constitutional law, little has been written on this cluster of topics, which go to the core of what sovereignty under the Constitution means. Aleinikoff asks not only how we define "ourselves," but exactly who is authorized to place themselves in the category of insiders empowered to set limits excluding others. The book stands out as a novel, intriguing, and interesting analysis against the sea of sameness found in the constitutional literature.--Philip P. Frickey, Law School, University of California, BerkeleyWhat lends Aleinikoff's work originality and importance is its synthetic range and the new insights that flow from bringing immigration, Indian, and territorial issues together, and taking on such much criticized anomalies as the plenary power doctrine in their full ambit. In my view, he may well make good on his hope of helping to inspire a new field of sovereignty studies. Certainly, the idea of "problematizing" national citizenship and national sovereignty is afoot in the law schools and, far more so, in sociology, political science, and in various interdisciplinary fields like American Studies, regional studies, and global political economiy and cultural studies. To my knowledge, no one has written a synthetic treatment of these issues that compares with Aleinikoff's in its mastery of constitutional law, its working knowledge or adjacent normative, historical and policy studies, and its intellectual clarity, stylistic grace, and morally sensitive but pragmatic political judgments.--William Forbath, University of Texas at Austin Law School 606 $aConstitutional law$zUnited States 606 $aNation-state 606 $aSovereignty 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aConstitutional law 615 0$aNation-state. 615 0$aSovereignty. 676 $a342.73/02 700 $aAleinikoff$b T. Alexander$g(Thomas Alexander),$f1952-$01051919 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910454838003321 996 $aSemblances of sovereignty$92482796 997 $aUNINA