LEADER 04787nam 2200721Ia 450 001 9910454703603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-281-84586-8 010 $a9786611845865 010 $a0-8213-7717-5 035 $a(CKB)1000000000705328 035 $a(EBL)459464 035 $a(OCoLC)560640583 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000086366 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11111015 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000086366 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10026415 035 $a(PQKB)10687538 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC459464 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL459464 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10257212 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL184586 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000705328 100 $a20080822d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDoes private sector participation improve performance in electricity and water distribution?$b[electronic resource] /$fKatharina Gassner, Alexander Popov, Nataliya Pushak 210 $aWashington, DC $cWorld Bank $cPublic-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility$dc2009 215 $a1 online resource (118 p.) 225 1 $aTrends and policy options ;$vno. 6 300 $a"Helping to eliminate poverty through private involvement in infrastructure." 311 $a0-8213-7715-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 87-91) and index. 327 $aCONTENTS; FOREWORD; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; ABOUT THE AUTHORS; ABBREVIATIONS; OVERVIEW; 1. INTRODUCTION; 2. EMPIRICAL LITERATURE; 3. SELECTION OF THE SAMPLE; FIGURE 3.1 Sample of PSP Cases and SOEs, by Sector; TABLE 3.1 Electricity Sample, by Region; FIGURE 3.2 Sample of PSP Cases for Electricity, by Type of Contract; FIGURE 3.3 Sample of PSP Cases for Water and Sanitation, by Type of Contract; TABLE 3.2 Water and Sanitation Sample, by Region; 4. EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY; 5. EMPIRICAL RESULTS; TABLE 5.1 Effect of PSP on Performance: Selected Results 327 $aTABLE 5.2 Effect of PSP on Performance: Results for All Impact Variables6. CONCLUSION; APPENDIXE A. Core Indicators; TABLE A.1 Description of Core Indicators; TABLE A.2 Utility-Year Observations, by Sector; TABLE A.3 Summary Statistics for Electricity; TABLE A.4 Summary Statistics for Water; TABLE A.5 Summary Statistics for Sanitation; FIGURE A.1 Time Trends of Core Indicators for Electricity; FIGURE A.2 Time Trends of Core Indicators for Water; FIGURE A.3 Time Trends of Core Indicators for Sanitation; APPENDIXE B. Variable Sources, Construction, and Estimations 327 $aAPPENDIXE C. Cox Proportionate Hazard EstimatesTABLE C.1 Cox Proportionate Hazard Estimates of Being Subjected to Various Types of PSP in Electricity; TABLE C.2 Cox Proportionate Hazard Estimates of Being Subjected to Various Types of PSP in Water and Sanitation; APPENDIXE D. Regression Results; TABLE D.1 Effect of PSP on Performance in Electricity; TABLE D.2 Effect of PSP on Performance in Electricity, by Type of PSP Contract; TABLE D.3 Effect of PSP on Performance in Water; TABLE D.4 Effect of PSP on Performance in Water, by Type of PSP Contract 327 $aTABLE D.5 Effect of PSP on Performance in SanitationTABLE D.6 Effect of PSP on Performance in Sanitation, by Type of PSP Contract; BIBLIOGRAPHY; INDEX 330 $aThis study examines the question of private versus public performance in a natural monopoly setting. It analyzes data from 301 utilities with private sector participation (PSP) and 926 utilities without PSP in 71 developing and transition economies to evaluate the impact of PSP on firm performance in electricity distribution and water and sanitation services. Private participation is shown to be associated with an increase in connections, labor productivity, and bill collection rates, and a decrease in employment and electricity distributional losses. 410 0$aPPIAF trends and policy options ;$vno. 6. 606 $aPublic utilities$xManagement$xEvaluation 606 $aElectric utilities$xManagement 606 $aWater utilities$xManagement 606 $aPublic-private sector cooperation 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aPublic utilities$xManagement$xEvaluation. 615 0$aElectric utilities$xManagement. 615 0$aWater utilities$xManagement. 615 0$aPublic-private sector cooperation. 676 $a333.793/2 700 $aGassner$b Katharina$01054883 701 $aPopov$b Alexander A$091179 701 $aPushak$b Nataliya$01054884 712 02$aWorld Bank. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910454703603321 996 $aDoes private sector participation improve performance in electricity and water distribution$92487859 997 $aUNINA