LEADER 03402nam 2200709 a 450 001 9910454535403321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-13082-X 010 $a9786612130823 010 $a0-8032-2445-1 035 $a(CKB)1000000000785584 035 $a(EBL)452190 035 $a(OCoLC)444447887 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000115222 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11131299 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000115222 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10004930 035 $a(PQKB)11389327 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC452190 035 $a(OCoLC)435442337 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse11906 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL452190 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10312898 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL213082 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000785584 100 $a20081209d2009 ub 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aBroken treaties$b[electronic resource] $eUnited States and Canadian relations with the Lakotas and the Plains Cree, 1868-1885 /$fJill St. Germain 210 $aLincoln $cUniversity of Nebraska Press$dc2009 215 $a1 online resource (485 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8032-1589-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aTitle Page; Copyright Page; Table of Contents; List of Illustrations; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1. Separate Pasts; 2. Expectations and Promises; 3. Early Efforts in the United States, 1868-1871; 4. Early Efforts in Canada, 1876-1878; 5. Negotiating the Relationship: the treaty of 1868, 1871-1875; 6. Misunderstanding in Practice: Treaty Six, 1879-1884; 7. The Treaty of 1868 and the Peace Policy, 1875-1876; 8. Treaty Six and the Northwest Rebellion, 1885; Conclusion; Appendix A: 1868 Treaty with the Sioux; Appendix B: 1876 Treaties at Forts Carltonand Pitt, Number Six 327 $aList of AbbreviationsNotes; Bibliography; Index 330 $aBroken Treaties is a comparative assessment of Indian treaty negotiation and implementation focusing on the first decade following the United States-Lakota Treaty of 1868 and Treaty Six between Canada and the Plains Cree (1876). Jill St. Germain argues that the "broken treaties" label imposed by nineteenth-century observers and perpetuated in the historical literature has obscured the implementation experience of both Native and non-Native participants and distorted our understanding of the relationships between them. As a result, historians have ignored the role of the Treaty of 1868 as the i 606 $aTeton Indians$xGovernment relations 606 $aTeton Indians$xHistory$y19th century 606 $aTeton Indians$vTreaties 606 $aCree Indians$xGovernment relations 606 $aCree Indians$xHistory$y19th century 606 $aCree Indians$vTreaties 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aTeton Indians$xGovernment relations. 615 0$aTeton Indians$xHistory 615 0$aTeton Indians 615 0$aCree Indians$xGovernment relations. 615 0$aCree Indians$xHistory 615 0$aCree Indians 676 $a323.1197 700 $aSt. Germain$b Jill$f1962-$01034777 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910454535403321 996 $aBroken treaties$92454110 997 $aUNINA