LEADER 01951nam 2200625Ia 450 001 9910454501703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-15539-3 010 $a9786612155390 010 $a90-272-9327-9 024 3 $z9789027230911 035 $a(CKB)1000000000535094 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000243936 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11211019 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000243936 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10168287 035 $a(PQKB)11063712 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC623097 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL623097 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10137864 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL215539 035 $a(OCoLC)237778041 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000535094 100 $a20060511d2006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aSemantic primes and universal grammar$b[electronic resource] $eempirical evidence from the Romance languages /$fedited by Bert Peeters 210 $aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins$dc2006 215 $axii, 374 p 225 1 $aStudies in language companion series,$x0165-7763 ;$vv. 81 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a90-272-3091-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 410 0$aStudies in language companion series ;$vv. 81. 606 $aSemantics 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general 606 $aMetalanguage 606 $aRomance languages$xSemantics 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aSemantics. 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general. 615 0$aMetalanguage. 615 0$aRomance languages$xSemantics. 676 $a401/.43 701 $aPeeters$b Bert$f1960-$0873554 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910454501703321 996 $aSemantic primes and universal grammar$92207479 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04709nam 2200601Ia 450 001 9910961672303321 005 20251116141108.0 010 $a0-309-18369-3 010 $a0-309-50179-2 035 $a(CKB)110986584753146 035 $a(EBL)3375469 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000093100 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11124632 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000093100 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10023637 035 $a(PQKB)11555317 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3375469 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3375469 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10038744 035 $a(OCoLC)923256580 035 $a(BIP)53855972 035 $a(BIP)6898582 035 $a(EXLCZ)99110986584753146 100 $a20010816d2000 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$a2000 assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Marine Corps science and technology program /$fCommittee for the Review of ONR's Marine Corps Science and Technology Program, Naval Studies Board, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, National Research Council 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academy Press$dc2000 215 $a1 online resource (104 p.) 225 1 $aONR assessment series 225 1 $aCompass series 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a0-309-07138-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a""Cover""; ""Front Matter""; ""Preface""; ""Acknowledgment of Reviewers""; ""Contents""; ""Executive Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 Maneuver""; ""3 Firepower""; ""4 Logistics""; ""5 Training and Education""; ""6 Command and Control""; ""7 Basic Research (6.1)""; ""8 Extending the Littoral Battlespace (ELB) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration""; ""9 Suggestions for Improving Program Effectiveness and Achieving Better Integration with the Marine Corps""; ""Appendixes""; ""A Terms of Reference""; ""B Previous Training and Education Studies""; ""C Committee Biographies""; ""D Acronyms"" 330 $aThis review of the Science and Technology (S&T) program of the Office of Naval Research's (ONR's) Expeditionary Warfare Operations Technology Division, Code 353, comes at a time of considerable change in the Marine Corps and in ONR, which are currently in the midst of significant transitions. The Marine Corps is making plans to equip and train for engaging in a new style of warfare known as Operational Maneuver From the Sea (OMFTS) and for performing a wide variety of missions in urban settings, ranging from humanitarian assistance to combat and mixes of these suggested by the term three-block war. During 1999, ONR assumed management of that portion of the Marine Corps S&T program that had not been assigned several years earlier to the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory (MCWL). In 2002, control of most of ONR's advanced development funding (6.3), and of much of its exploratory development funding (6.2), will move from ONR's line divisions, of which Code 353 is one of many, to 12 new program offices, each dedicated to demonstrating technologies for future naval capabilities (FNCs). Given these changes, it is not surprising that some of the projects inherited recently by ONR, and assessed by the Committee for the Review of ONR's Marine Corps Science and Technology Program under the auspices of the Naval Studies Board of the National Research Council, differed from the customary ONR project and were more akin to preacquisition or acquisition support than to S&T. It is also not surprising that Code 353 could not articulate its plans for future investments clearly and concisely, given the current uncertainty about the content of and funding level for FNCs. The Marine Corps S&T program supports the five imperatives for technology advancement that the Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC) has identified as prerequisites for the transition to OMFTS: maneuver, firepower, logistics, training and education, and command and control. The committee supports investment in these areas and, in the report's discussions and recommendations, follows the five imperatives. 410 0$aONR assessment series. 410 0$aCompass series. 517 3 $aAssessment of the Office of Naval Research's Marine Corps science and technology program 606 $aTechnology 615 0$aTechnology. 676 $a359.9/6/072073 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910961672303321 996 $a2000 assessment of the Office of Naval Research's Marine Corps science and technology program$94467877 997 $aUNINA