LEADER 03791nam  22007332  450 
001 9910454217403321
005 20151005020622.0
010   $a1-107-19182-3
010   $a1-283-33043-1
010   $a1-139-13494-9
010   $a9786613330437
010   $a0-511-80459-8
010   $a1-139-12990-2
010   $a1-139-13383-7
010   $a0-511-50495-0
010   $a0-511-50709-7
035   $a(CKB)1000000000719039
035   $a(EBL)424515
035   $a(OCoLC)437109998
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000358487
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11278134
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000358487
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10359771
035   $a(PQKB)11203477
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511804595
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC424515
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL424515
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10289144
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL333043
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000719039
100   $a20101021d2009||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aCrime and culpability $ea theory of criminal law /$fby Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan with contributions by Stephen J. Morse$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2009.
215   $a1 online resource (xiii, 358 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge introductions to philosophy and law
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a0-521-73961-6 
311   $a0-521-51877-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 331-348) and index.
327   $aPart One. Introduction : retributivism and the criminal law. Criminal law, punishment, and desert -- Part Two. The culpable choice. The essence of culpability : acts manifesting insufficient concern for the legally protected interests of others ; Negligence ; Defeaters of culpability -- Part Three. The culpable act. Only culpability, not resulting harm, affects desert ; When are inchoate crimes culpable and why? ; The locus of culpability -- Part Four. A proposed code. What a culpability-based criminal code might look like.
330   $aThis book presents a comprehensive overview of what the criminal law would look like if organised around the principle that those who deserve punishment should receive punishment commensurate with, but no greater than, that which they deserve. Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan argue that desert is a function of the actor's culpability, and that culpability is a function of the risks of harm to protected interests that the actor believes he is imposing and his reasons for acting in the face of those risks. The authors deny that resultant harms, as well as unperceived risks, affect the actor's desert. They thus reject punishment for inadvertent negligence as well as for intentions or preparatory acts that are not risky. Alexander and Ferzan discuss the reasons for imposing risks that negate or mitigate culpability, the individuation of crimes, and omissions.
410  0$aCambridge introductions to philosophy and law.
517 3 $aCrime & Culpability
606   $aPunishment$xPhilosophy
606   $aCriminal law$xPhilosophy
606   $aCriminal law$zUnited States$xPhilosophy
615  0$aPunishment$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aCriminal law$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aCriminal law$xPhilosophy.
676   $a345/.001
700   $aAlexander$b Larry$f1943-$0285683
702   $aFerzan$b Kimberly Kessler$f1971-
702   $aMorse$b Stephen J.
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910454217403321
996   $aCrime and culpability$91903331
997   $aUNINA